Laserfiche WebLink
<br />generally unbiased quantitative method be used. As an option, URS would develop a quantitative Funds <br />Allocation model to provide a systematic, rational basis for allocating available limited funds among <br />different jurisdictions. The model will be based on using multiple criteria that provide a defensible basis for <br />allocating funds. Potential criteria for funding allocation include the cost of meeting high-priority needs. <br />the number of targets weighted by their vulnerability. the number of mutual-aid obligations, and the <br />likelihood of a wide-spread. regional impact if an incident were to occur. In consultation with the steering <br />committee, URS will develop an appropriate list of criteria and assess their relative importance for funding <br />allocation. For each jurisdiction. URS will compile relevant factual data with regard to the defined criteria <br />and calculate a numerical weighted funding score. A preliminary allocation of available funds among the <br />jurisdictions will then be derived in proportion to the funding scores of the jurisdictions. This preliminary <br />allocation will be provided to the steering committee for review. The goal will be to provide a logical, <br />unbiased starting point for the allocation of funds among the jurisdictions. The steering committee may <br />revise this preliminary allocation based on non-tangible factors that may not have been addressed in the <br />numerical model. We will be happy to provide the City with a cost for these services at a later date if there <br />is interest in this approach. <br /> <br />Page 16 of 51 <br />