My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-040 - Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-24
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
2005-040 - Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 12:10:45 PM
Creation date
4/15/2005 4:55:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2005-040
Date
4/4/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(2) <br /> <br />The FAA considered and analyzed the impact <br />on all existing and planned public-use airports, <br />military airports and aeronautical facilities. <br /> <br />The FAA considered and analyzed the <br />cumulative impact resulting from the proposed <br />structure when combined with the impact of <br />other existing or proposed structures. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />The ALUC "considers and recognizes the FAA <br />as the single 'Authority' for analyzing project <br />impact on airport or aeronautical operations, or <br />navigational-aid siting, including interference <br />with navigation-aids or published flight paths <br />and procedures." AELUP, § 2.1.3, Page 14. <br /> <br />A Tom Krause Aviation Consulting report entitled <br />Geneva Commons Aviation Impact Analysis, <br />Instrument Approach, Dep¡;¡rtureproceçlure and VRF <br />Analysis of John Wayne Airport (hereinafter "Krause <br />An¡;¡lysis") cçmph.¡ded that the prqject would not pose <br />an adverse impact on any InstrlJment Approach <br />Procedures, Departure Procedures or VFR <br />ProcedUres at JWA. (Attached heretq as Exhibit S.) <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />f) <br /> <br />Based on the FAA's Aeronautical Study, the Krause <br />Analysis, and the lack of factual evidence by JWA or <br />the ALUC to the contrary, the proposed project: <br /> <br />(1 ) <br />(2) <br /> <br />Is not a hazard to air navigation. <br /> <br />Does not raise the ceiling or visibility minimums <br />at JWA for an existing or planned instrument <br />procedure. <br /> <br />Does not result in a loss of JWA's utility. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />Does not conflict with the VFR air space use <br />for the JW A traffic pattern or for en route <br />navigation to and from JWA. <br /> <br />g) <br /> <br />Therefore, based upon the above, this project is <br />consistent with the safe operations, both existing and <br />proposed, of JWA. Since JWA has no adopted plans <br />for expansion of JWA within the next twenty years, <br />this project is consistent with the long-range <br />development of JWA. <br /> <br />Resolution 20QlhQ40 <br />Page 9 of61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.