My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25J - 2005 URBAN WATER MGMT PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
05/02/2005
>
25J - 2005 URBAN WATER MGMT PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:55:46 PM
Creation date
4/25/2005 4:55:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25J
Date
5/2/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br /> <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br /> <br />MAY 2, 2005 <br />TITLE: <br /> <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />D As Recommended <br />D As Amended <br />D Ordinance on 15t Reading <br />o Ordinance on 2nd Reading <br />D Implementing Resolution <br />D Set Public Hearing For <br /> <br />AGREEMENT FOR 2005 URBAN <br />WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WITH <br />PSOMAS <br /> <br /> <br />/) /h <2 <br />/ztt~~/(/ ,,,"_ <br />CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />CONTINUED TO <br /> <br />FILE NUMBER <br /> <br />L/ RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> <br />Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and <br />the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with PSOMAS for an <br />amount not to exceed $42,599 for the preparation of the City's 2005 Urban <br />Water Management Plan. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Urban water suppliers are required by the Urban Water Management Planning <br />Act (UWMP) to update and submit a plan to the Department of Water <br />Resources every five years. The UWMP requires water suppliers to <br />describe and evaluate sources of water supply, efficient uses of water, <br />demand management measures, implementation strategy and schedule, and <br />other relevant information and programs. <br /> <br />Requests for proposal to prepare the UWMP were sent to six engineering <br />firms. Five responses were received and evaluated on technical merit by <br />a three-member selection committee. All six firms received passing <br />scores of 70 or higher. Listed below are the top three scores and <br />proposed fees. <br /> <br />FIRM SCORE FEE <br />PSOMAS 90 $42,599 <br />HDR Engineering 85 $42,300 <br />Ergun Bakall Consulting Civil <br />Engineer 81 $24,870 <br /> <br />Staff recommends that PSOMAS be retained for this project. They were the <br />top ranked firm based on technical merit, although did not provide the <br />lowest cost proposal. Their proposal demonstrated that the firm has <br />extensive experience with similar projects, a good understanding of the <br />project goals and objectives. <br /> <br />25J-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.