My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2005-05-02
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
05/02/2005
>
FULL PACKET_2005-05-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:55:41 PM
Creation date
4/27/2005 10:38:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TABLE 4 <br /> <br />WEEKEND THEORETICAL SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS (1] <br />Famsa Expansion, Santa Ana <br /> <br /> <br />6:00 AM <br />7:00 AM <br />8:00 AM <br />9:00AM <br />]O:OOAM <br />] 1:00 AM <br />NOON <br />]:00 PM <br />.......-........... <br />................. <br />tiOifr.M <br />............. ..... <br />................... <br />3:00 PM <br />4:00 PM <br />5:00 PM <br />6:00 PM <br />7:00 PM <br />8:00 PM <br />9:00 PM <br />]0:00 PM <br />]]:00 PM <br />MIDNIGHT <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />................................,... <br />...................................... <br />:.:.;':e~:: <br />'..'.'.'.':~~mf~..Ii... <br />..:tlm,*:P.Wl~f) <br />..........-............................................................ .......................-................................................ ...........................................,....................... ............................................................ <br />~iA.$.tr. .....t1~~Sjt........... ......... .Mmr..S.t'..'................ .......1~M3~...SF.....,................. <br /> <br />~1I.1'll.iA.!:,II'I'I=tr' <br /> <br />..................................... ..................................... ..................................... ................. .................... <br /> <br />.~I~I!~I_~I~~I_!II~!~~~I!i[I<<~!~tllir~~I~! <br /> <br />Pi\fuAAd;t$p.~#.:il.t i~~:$~ i .Pi\fu#AA...:)$M~iiiJ. ..:v.~~:$.j~\ <br />0% 0 0% 0 3% 0 0% 0 <br />3% 10 3% 4 20% 2 2% 3 <br />10% 32 10% ]4 63% 5 3% 4 <br />30% 97 30% 4] 93% 7 6% 8 <br />45% ]45 45% 6] 100% 8 8% ]0 <br />73% 235 73% 99 100% 8 10% 13 <br />85% 274 85% 116 90% 7 30% 39 <br />95% 306 95% ]29 90% 7 45% 59 <br />...... ......... .... ................. ................... <br />.....ii~;(~ }"':m)Ioo~~ ....tiii:i <br />] 00% 322 100% 136 <br />90% 290 90% ] 22 <br />75% 242 75% ]02 <br />65% 209 65% 88 <br />60% ] 93 60% 82 <br />55% ]77 55% 75 <br />40% ] 29 40% 54 <br />38% ]22 38% 52 <br />13% 42 13% ]8 <br />0% 0 0% 0 <br /> <br />o <br />19 <br />55 <br />]53 <br />224 <br />355 <br />436 <br />501 <br /> <br />................. <br />:~~jj(/ <br />.~i~~ <br />$#p.p.~y: <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />.................... <br />................... <br />..........505....:.... <br />. ................ <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br />505 <br /> <br />+505 <br />+486 <br />+450 <br />+352 <br />+28] <br />+]50 <br />+69 <br />+4 <br /> <br />45% <br /> <br /> <br />93% 7 <br />77% 6 <br />47% 4 <br />23% 2 <br />7% ] <br />7% ] <br />3% 0 <br />3% 0 <br />0% 0 <br />0% 0 <br /> <br />45% <br /> <br />60% <br /> <br />90% <br /> <br />95% <br /> <br />]00% <br /> <br />]00% <br /> <br />95% <br /> <br />85% <br /> <br />70% <br /> <br />]24 <br /> <br />130 <br />130 <br />]24 <br /> <br />11] <br />91 <br /> <br />59 <br />59 <br />78 <br />]]7 <br /> <br />524 <br />477 <br />426 <br />4]6 <br />400 <br />383 <br />313 <br />298 <br />17] <br />91 <br /> <br />-]9 <br />+28 <br />+79 <br />+89 <br />+]05 <br />+122 <br />+192 <br />+207 <br />+334 <br />+4]4 <br /> <br />[I] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages provided in the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking Publication. <br />[2] In an effort to remain conservative, the weekday office parking demand profiles per ULI were utilized. <br /> <br />n:\2500\204259]\Tab]es\259] Table 3 Weekday Shared Parking,x]s <br /> <br />758.,.27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.