My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1516, 1518, 1520, 1522, 1526, 1528 EAST WARNER AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
05/16/2005
>
31A - 1516, 1518, 1520, 1522, 1526, 1528 EAST WARNER AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:55:30 PM
Creation date
5/10/2005 4:25:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
5/16/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />V. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />(A) No Impac t <br /> <br />The buildings located on the project site are less than 35 years <br />in age and have no historical significance. Additionally, the <br />City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR indicates that there <br />are no structures on the proj ect site that are designated a <br />federal, state or local historical resource. Therefore, <br />implementation of the proposed project would not result in <br />significant impacts to any historic resource. <br /> <br />(B.D) Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR the <br />project site is not known to contain archaeological resources. <br />However, the General Plan Land Use Element EIR indicates that <br />based on the number of known archeological sites in Santa Ana, <br />there is high potential for unknown archaeological resources to <br />exist in the City. Given the limited amount of earthwork <br />activity involved with the proposed project, the discovery of <br />unknown archeological resources would be remote. <br /> <br />(C) No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the <br />proposed project site is not located in an area where <br />paleontological resources are known to exist. Therefore, <br />implementation of the proposed project would not result in <br />adverse impacts to paleontological resources. <br /> <br />VI. GEOLOGY/SOILS <br /> <br />(A-l) No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR there <br />are no known active faults that cross the project site. <br />Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not <br />expose people or structures to potential ground rupture impacts. <br /> <br />(A-2) Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The project site is situated within a highly active seismic <br />region of southern California. Thirty-eight active faults have <br />been identified within an approximate 60-mile radius of the <br />project site. The Whittier Fault, located approximately 5 miles <br />from the proj ect site is considered to be the most dominant <br />fault ln regard to potential seismic shaking impacts. The <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />31A~16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.