My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - 2810 3/4 SOUTH FLOWER
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
05/16/2005
>
75A - 2810 3/4 SOUTH FLOWER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:55:32 PM
Creation date
5/11/2005 9:24:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
5/16/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Federal law exempts local jurisdictions from regulating <br />health related issues as these issues are covered under <br />Federal laws. However, the proposed facility will be in <br />compliance with both the Federal Communications <br />Commission (FCC) and Federal Aviation Administration <br />(FAA) safety regulations. <br /> <br />3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic <br />stability or future economic development of properties surrounding <br />the area? <br /> <br />The existing monopalm, in conjunction with the grove of <br />trees, will be compatible with the surrounding area and will <br />not adversely affect the economic viability in the area as the <br />monopalm has a design that will give it the look of a palm <br />tree, with landscaping a major tool used in maintaining and <br />increasing the economic stability of project sites. <br /> <br />4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions <br />specified in Chapter 41 for such use? <br /> <br />The cellular facility has been designed to comply with the <br />regulations and conditions identified in Chapter 41 of the <br />Santa Ana Municipal Code for a major wireless facility. <br />Colocation of carriers is strongly encouraged when possible. <br /> <br />5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any <br />specific plan of the City? <br /> <br />The monopole, as designed, will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan, as cellular facilities, designed to be compatible <br />with the surrounding environment, are consistent with the <br />goals and objectives of the Institutional (INS) General Plan <br />designation. <br /> <br />E. This project was reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental <br />Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant <br />to Section 15303. This Class 3 exemption allows for the construction and <br />location of limited numbers of new, small facilities and structures. <br />Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2004-161 will be filed <br />for this project. <br /> <br />Section 2. The City Council after conducting the public hearing hereby approves <br />Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-23 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and <br />incorporated herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the <br />abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not limited to: the Request for Council <br />Action dated May 16, 2005 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all <br />of which are incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> <br />75A-22 <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2005-049 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.