Laserfiche WebLink
Ralph Sneegas, 1111 North Tustin, addressed Council with a complaint <br />regarding the City's vending machine license structure. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Direct the City Manager to report on April 16, 1984, providing <br />an analysis of the City's vending license fees, and to meet <br />with Mr. Sneegas as a representative of the vending <br />machine industry for his input. <br /> <br />MOTION: Young SECOND: Griset <br /> <br />VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Acosta, Bricken, Griset, Johnson, Luxembourger, <br /> McGuigan, Young <br />None <br />None FILE 315 <br /> <br />Ralph Allen, 1002 River Lane, addressed Council stating that he would <br />prefer to see wrought iron fencing in the City of Santa Aha as opposed to <br />chain link (ghetto) fences. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Instruct City Manager to investigate circumstances <br />surrounding placement of Ralph Allen's chain link <br />fence from Main Street property on Griset front lawn <br />the evening of March 19, 1984. <br /> <br />MOTION: Griset SECOND: Young <br /> <br />VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Acosta, Bricken, Griset, Johnson, Luxembourger, <br /> McGuigan, Young <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Greg Petersen, of Petersen and Ferguson, addressed Council explaining that <br />he was present for the Executive Session relative to his request at the <br />previous Council Meeting. <br /> <br />At 11:23 p.m., the Council recessed to Executive Session and reconvened at <br />11:46 p.m., with the same members present. <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION REPORT <br /> <br />The City Attorney explained that the Council had discussed the Collins and <br />Sanchez cases, as well as the letter from Petersen and Ferguson dated <br />March 16, 1984, in Executive Session. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Indicate to Mr. Petersen that the Council: 1) will not meet with <br />him in Executive Session without representation of the City <br />Attorney; 2) reaffirr~sCouncil's decision to provide Paul, <br />Hastings, Janofsky and Walker as counsel to the individual <br />defendants in the case; 3) indicates that the employees <br />involved should provide in writing a request for separate <br />defense for Council's review, should said employees request <br />separate counsel; and 4) receives and files the correspondence <br />March 16, 1984. <br /> <br />MOTION: Young SECOND: Bricken <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 101 MARCH 19, 1984 <br /> <br /> <br />