My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - NEXUS DEVELOPMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
06/20/2005
>
75B - NEXUS DEVELOPMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:54:43 PM
Creation date
6/15/2005 2:26:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
6/20/2005
Destruction Year
2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MacArthur Place South Findings and Facts in Support of Findings <br />Environmental Impact Report <br /> <br />effects of the project would have no significant adverse or no adverse impact on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />4.3.1 Agriculture <br /> <br />Based on the analysis summarized in Section 2.7 in the EIR, the MacArthur Place South project <br />site is developed with urbanized land uses and void of any agriculture resources. Therefore, the <br />MacArthur Place South project would not result in adverse impacts related to agriculture <br />resources. No mitigation is required. <br /> <br />4.3.2 Air Quality <br /> <br />Based on the analysis summarized in Section 2.7 in the EIR, the construction process for the <br />project could produce objectionable odors, but the effects would be short-term and would affect <br />a small amount of persons. Therefore, the MacArthur Place South project would not result in <br />significant adverse impacts related to odors. No mitigation is required. <br /> <br />4.3.3 Cultural Resources <br /> <br />Based on the analysis summarized in Section 2.7 in the EIR, there are no historical, archeological <br />or paleontological resources on the project site. Therefore, the MacArthur Place South project <br />would not result in significant adverse impacts related to currently known and recorded historic, <br />prehistoric and archeological resources. No mitigation is required. <br /> <br />4.3.5 Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> <br />Based on the analysis summarized in Section 2.7 in the EIR, the project would not interfere with <br />groundwater recharge because the project area is not located in an area that is known to recharge <br />the groundwater system, additionally, the project site is not located within a 1 DO-year flood plain. <br />Therefore, the MacArthur Place South project would not result significant adverse impacts to <br />underground water supplies and flooding. No mitigation is required. <br /> <br />4.3.6 Transportation and Circulation <br /> <br />Based on the analysis summarized in Section 2.7 in the EIR, the proposed project will not result <br />in significant adverse impacts related to traffic safety hazards, emergency access constraints or <br />be in conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative modes of transportation patterns. No <br />mitigation is required. <br /> <br />4.3.7 Land Use <br /> <br />Based on the analysis summarized in Section 2.7 and analyzed in Section 5.7 of the EIR, the <br />proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan, with approval of the zone change <br />the project would not be in conflict with the zoning ordinance. Additionally, the project would <br />not result in significant adverse impacts related to division of an established community or <br />impacts to any habitat conservation plan. No mitigation is required. <br /> <br />Exhibit B <br />Page 29 of 38 <br /> <br />Page 29 <br /> <br />75B-57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.