My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-063 - Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Property Located at 1, 9 and 10 East Hutton Centre Drive
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
2005-063 - Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Property Located at 1, 9 and 10 East Hutton Centre Drive
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:28:13 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 2:57:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2005-063
Date
6/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MacArthur Place South Findings and Facts in Support of Findings <br />Environmental Impact Report <br /> <br />the remaining components of the proposed project would remain. Without the Cinema Tower, <br />the amount of residential uses for the project would be reduced, by 154 dwelling units. As shown <br />on Table I, under the Without Cinema Tower Alternative, impacts associated with aesthetics, air <br />quality, noise, public services and transportation would be less. Impacts to aviation, geology, <br />hazards, hydrology, land use, utilities and recreation would be the same. Impacts to <br />population/housing would be greater. The Without Cinema Tower Alternative would not <br />maximize mixed-use development opportunities on the project site, but it would attain all of the <br />project objectives. <br /> <br />6.4 COMPARISON OF IMP ACTS <br /> <br />Table I compares the unavoidable adverse impacts of the MacArthur Place South project with <br />the No Project Alternative, Reduced Building Height Alternative, Existing Zoning Alternative <br />and Without Cinema Tower Alternative. <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />MacArthur Place South and Project Alternative Impact Comparison <br /> <br /> MacArthur Place Reduced Existing Without <br />Impact Category No Project Cinema <br /> South Project Building Height Zoning Tower <br />Aesthetics Unavoidable Less Than Less Than Less Than Less Than <br /> Significant MacArthur MacArthur Place MacArthur MacArthur <br /> Impacts in regards Place South South Project Place South Place South <br /> to Height and Project. Project. Project <br /> Mass of structures <br /> and shade and <br /> Shadow <br />Aviation Less Than Less Than Equal to Equal to Equal to <br /> Significant Impact MacArthur MacArthur Place MacArthur MacArthur <br /> with Incorporation Place South South Project Place South Place South <br /> of Mitigation Project. Project Project <br />Air Quality Unavoidable Less Than Less Than Greater Than Less Than <br /> Significant MacArthur MacArthur Place MacArthur MacArthur <br /> construction Place South South Project. Place South Place South <br /> related, Long Project. Project Project. <br /> Term Operation <br /> and Cumulative <br /> Impacts <br />Geology Less than Less Than Equal to Less Than Equal to <br /> significant impact MacArthur MacArthur Place MacArthur MacArthur <br /> with Incorporation Place South South Project Place South Place <br /> of Mitigation Project. Project. South <br /> Project <br />Hazards Less than Less Than Equal to Less Than Equal to <br /> significant impact MacArthur MacArthur Place MacArthur MacArthur <br /> with Incorporation Place South South Project Place South Place <br /> of Mitigation Project. Project. South <br /> Prolect <br /> <br />Exhibit B <br />Page 33 of 38 <br /> <br />Page 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.