Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STUDIO 3 <br />ARCHITECTS <br /> <br />architecture <br />planning <br />interiors <br /> <br />March 9,2005 <br /> <br />Planning and Building Agency <br />Panning Division <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92702 <br /> <br />RE: Appeal Application <br />III. Reason for request <br />419 E. First Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> <br />S3A# 041054 <br /> <br />A variance Was requested for a reduction in parking at the Santa Ana Downtown Plaza to <br />allow for an addition of3,881 s.f. to the existing FAMSA store due to the city <br />considering the use retail. The stalls as marked on the plans are located at the rear of the <br />site normally used by employees and for deliveries. Based on the findings from the <br />planning department, the variance was recommended for approval. A parking study <br />provided for the site demonstrates that the center has an excess of parking needed during <br />peak hours to support the business it serves if one accepts the shared use parking analysis <br />that staff accepted for planning conditions. <br /> <br />Items brought up during the Planning Commission Hearing, beyond the control of the <br />landlord, have been used to deny the project, such as the overflow of parking from other <br />sites, and lack of maintenance which we have explained is scheduled for compliance <br />upon permit. Staff reported that only one sign would require modification. <br /> <br />As downtown Santa Ana begins to evolve with new business and attractions, so does the <br />need for parking. Although there are fee based city parking structures to alleviate the <br />demand, people will chose to park, for free, at the adjacent shopping centers. With the <br />recent construction and continued growth of the artist lofts, the demand will continue to <br />grow and burden the existing neighboring centers. <br /> <br />The Santa Ana Downtown Plaza is one of the most affected centers from this type of <br />overload. Not only is parking an issue but the pedestrian traffic generated by the over use <br />of the center by those not willing to use the city provided parking structures. Pedestrian <br />traffic in turn generates an excess wear on the site, landscape and maintenance. The <br />applicant has made efforts to cooperate with the city; however, the city cannot assist. <br /> <br />The burden imposed by neighboring city approved developments is being singled out as a <br />basis of denial. although the site is regularly maintained. Suggesting that the parking area <br />be metered, gated, or the closing of adjacent le~ser producing business further imposes on <br /> <br />949-660-79X5 <br />20101 S,W Birch SL <br />Suitc 240 <br />Newport Beach. CA 92660 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />909-9X2 -1717 <br />325 N, Second Avcnuc <br />Suite E <br />Upland. CA 917X6 604X <br /> <br />55A-36 <br />