My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-079 - Denying Variance No. 2005-09
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
2005-079 - Denying Variance No. 2005-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:28:21 PM
Creation date
9/22/2005 5:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2005-079
Date
9/6/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />i. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject <br />property where the strict interpretation of the zoning <br />ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of <br />privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and <br />purpose of the provisions of the zoning code. <br /> <br />ii. The existing service station is situated at a prominent <br />business location, directly north of the freeway off-ramp and <br />immediately adjacent to the freeway on-ramp. Additionally, <br />Seventeenth Street is a major arterial street and provides a <br />large volume of traffic in this area. In addition, there is an <br />existing 35-foot freestanding pole sign on the southeast <br />portion of the site that provides additional identification to the <br />site. Therefore, there is no need for additional signage or <br />identification symbols on the premises. <br /> <br />iii. This is a typical lot with no unique site features that warrant <br />a structure to exceed the maximum allowable height limit <br />within the zone. <br /> <br />2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation <br />and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. <br /> <br />The denial of the variance will not significantly impact the <br />right of the property owner to enjoy the use of their property. <br />Seventeenth Street is a major arterial in the City and has a <br />high traffic volume. The construction of a 50-foot tall <br />flagpole will not guarantee any greater enjoyment or <br />business attraction permitted by code. <br /> <br />3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to <br />the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br /> <br />The granting of a variance will be detrimental and <br />aesthetically incompatible to the surrounding residential <br />uses, when considering that no other structure is similar in <br />height to the proposed structure and the residential uses <br />located immediately to the north of this site, which are <br />considered a sensitive land use. <br /> <br />4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan of the City. <br /> <br />The Santa Ana Freeway is designated as a primary street <br />corridor and Seventeenth Street is designated as a <br />secondary street corridor and major arterial in the City's <br />General Plan. The General Plan discourages the intrusion <br />of unsightly signage and other similar structures, such as the <br />proposed 50-foot tall flagpole, which impact the visual and <br />aesthetic qualities of these corridors. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2005-079 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.