My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
A-2004-176-18
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
O
>
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA)
>
A-2004-176-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 2:32:52 PM
Creation date
11/9/2005 4:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
Orange County Transportation Authority
Contract #
A-2004-176-18
Agency
Police
Council Approval Date
8/16/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Attachment A <br /> <br />Part One - Grant Overview, Continued <br /> <br />Allocations and <br />Methodologies - <br />Overview <br /> <br />California has been allocated $141,672,927 for FY04 VASI, and is required <br />to subgrant at least 80% of the funds, or $113,338,342, to urban areas and <br />transit agencies. Like the FY 03 VASI Part II grant, however, in an effort to <br />ensure that each urban area has as much resources as possible to address the <br />needs and priorities identified in the urban area assessment and strategy, the <br />state is declining its option of retaining 20% of the VASI and mass transit <br />funding. As was the case last year, at least with regard to the UASI grants, it <br />is expected that the state's 20% portion will be distributed so as to benefit the <br />urban area as a whole. When submitting this application, all grant recipients <br />are requested to provide a breakdown of the funding distribution by <br />jurisdiction. <br /> <br />The federal Department of Homeland Security determined the allocations for <br />each of California's urban areas by using a formula based upon a combination <br />of current threat estimates, critical assets within the urban area and population <br />density. The formula was a weighted linear combination of each factor, the <br />result of which was ranked and used to calculate the proportional allocation of <br />resources. Mass transit systems eligible for participation in the FY04 VAS I <br />program were identified using a formula based upon ridership and total route <br />miles. Only heavy rail and commuter rail systems were included. <br /> <br />At the discretion of each grant recipient, funds may be distributed between <br />eligible categories (planning, equipment, training, exercises, management and <br />administration); however, no more than 3% of the total allocation to each <br />grant recipient may be used for management and administration costs. <br /> <br />The state is prohibited from retaining any of the $113,338,342 unless <br />requested, in writing, from the urban area or transit agency. If requested, the <br />state may retain some or all of the urban area or transit agency allocation for <br />purchases made by the state on behalf of the urban area or transit agency. In <br />this situation, the state and urban area or transit agency must enter into a <br />Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) specifYing the amount offunds to be <br />retained by the state. <br /> <br />Continued on next page <br /> <br />FY04 Urban Areas Security Initiative <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.