My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - 2106-2230 N. TUSTIN AVE.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
12/19/2005
>
32A - 2106-2230 N. TUSTIN AVE.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:49:34 PM
Creation date
12/14/2005 10:15:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32A
Date
12/19/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />as proposed by the applicant, is not consistent with <br />Policy 2.7 of the General Plan which is intended to <br />promote the rehabilitation of commercial properties. <br /> <br />ii. The proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to all <br />applicable requirements of the zoning and subdivision codes <br />as well as other applicable City ordinances. <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision does not conform to the <br />provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Section <br />66474{b) of the Subdivision Map Act states that the <br />legislative body of a city shall deny a tentative map if <br />it makes the finding that the design or improvement of <br />the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the <br />applicable general and specific plans. Under the <br />current ownership conditions, the vacant parcel <br />(Parcel 1) would be developed as an integrated parcel <br />with Parcel 2, which contains an existing retail center. <br />Upon the sale of one parcel to another owner, it <br />becomes extremely difficult to maintain an integrated <br />development due to dual ownership. The coordinated <br />rehabilitation of the buildings, parking areas and <br />landscaping would suffer as each parcel would be a <br />"stand alone" parcel. <br /> <br />iii. The project site is physically suitable for the type and density <br />of the proposed project. <br /> <br />The proposed site is not physically suitable for the <br />subdivision as proposed since new nonconformance <br />in the parking requirement existed at Parcel 2. A total <br />of 181 parking spaces are required for Parcel 2, only <br />170 parking spaces are provided. <br /> <br />iv. The design and improvements of the proposed project will <br />not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially <br />and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. <br /> <br />Since the project site is located in an urbanized area, <br />there are no known fish or wildlife populations existing <br />on the project site. Therefore, the proposed <br />subdivision will not cause any substantial <br />environmental damage or substantially and avoidably <br />injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. <br /> <br />v. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not <br />cause serious public health problems. <br /> <br />There are no new buildings or building square footage <br />proposed as part of this project and, therefore, no <br />alterations are proposed to the development project <br /> <br />32A-11 <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2005-78 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.