My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
TEMPLO CALVARIO 3 - 2005
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
T
>
TEMPLO CALVARIO 3 - 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:58:26 PM
Creation date
1/23/2006 10:35:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
Templo Calvario
Contract #
A-2005-254
Agency
Community Development
Council Approval Date
10/17/2005
Expiration Date
12/31/2006
Insurance Exp Date
2/8/2007
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />4. The burden of proof should be reasonable and flexible, dependent upon the <br />circumstances of the case involved. The hearing officer determines the order <br />of proof. Generally, the party making the complaint has the obligation of <br />establishing his or her case and should be examined first. <br /> <br />5. The party involved should have the right to be represented (at their own <br />expense) if he/he so desires. Other he/she is limited to his/her own abilities <br />and those of the hearing officer in obtaining testimony in the case. <br /> <br />6. . It is important that the hearing officer obtain the fullest information for the <br />record. If the parties involved, or their representatives, do not know how to <br />ask the right or pertinent questions in pursuing their right to due process, it <br />shall be necessary for the hearing officer to step in to have all the materials <br />and relevant facts elicited. . <br /> <br />7. The practice in informal hearings is generally not to apply strict rules of <br />evidence in obtaining facts. However, the quantity of evidence required to <br />support a decision on an issue should be sufficiently credible that the state (or <br />other appropriate agency), upon reviewing the decision, would conclude that <br />the decision is supported by substantial evidence. <br /> <br />8. The hearing officer should attempt to negotiate a resolution of the issue at any, <br />time prior to the conclusion of the hearing. <br /> <br />9. Within ten (10) days of the conclusion' of the hearing, the hearing officer wili <br />issue a recommended decision to the LWIA for final determination. The <br />recommended decision shall be in writing and may be accepted, rejected or <br />modified by the Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board. <br /> <br />C. Issuance of Decision <br /> <br />Within sixty (60) calendar days of filing of the complaint, the Santa Ana LWIA shali <br />issue a written decision to all parties by first class mail. The final decision shall <br />contain the foliowing information: <br /> <br />1. The name of the parties involved. <br /> <br />2. A statement of the alieged violation and issues related to the alieged violation. <br /> <br />3. A statement of the facts. <br /> <br />4. The decision and the reasons for the decision. <br /> <br />5. A statement of corrective action, if any, to be taken. <br /> <br />6. Notice of the right to request, within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the <br />decision, a review of the decision by the State Review Panel. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.