Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Variance Nos. 05-66 and 05-67 <br />January 9, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Although the 13 additional parking spaces needed for the proposed <br />expansion were not a part of the MacArthur Place entitlements, the 13 <br />parking spaces can be accommodated. A shared parking study was prepared <br />by Kaku Associates, Inc. by using the Urban Land Institute's (ULI) shared <br />parking methodology. The shared parking analysis identified a weekday <br />peak parking demand of 1,696 spaces and a weeknight peak demand of 1,783 <br />spaces. Peak utilization during the weekend would be 1,807 spaces during <br />the evening when the restaurants are the busiest (Exhibit 7) . <br /> <br />Since the MacArthur Place South development will supply a total of 1,896 <br />spaces, the proposed parking supply is adequate to meet both the demand of <br />the MacArthur Place project and the 2 Hutton Centre expansion. <br /> <br />Setback Variance <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to reduce the <br />required building setback on Hutton Center Loop from 25 feet to 10 feet. <br />If approved, the proposed setback will be consistent with the reduced <br />setback approved for the Lake Towers project and will assist in <br />continuing the urban proj ect theme of MacArthur Place South. For <br />example, urban projects generally consist of elements that have been <br />incorporated into this project, such as a reduced setback (from the code <br />required 15 feet) and enhanced pedestrian pathways. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />The 2 Hutton Centre project is in compliance with various policies <br />outlined in the General Plan Land Use Element. The development of this <br />site with quality materials and finishes, and the continuation of <br />pedestrian linkages to other existing developments will complement the <br />recently entitled MacArthur Place South development. Therefore, based <br />upon an analysis of the project and the project's compatibility with the <br />City's General Plan and applicable development standards, staff recommends <br />that the Planning Commission approve Variance Nos. 2005-66 and 2005-67 as <br />conditioned. <br /> <br />31A-4 <br />