My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
50A - HOOKAH LOUNGES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
02/21/2006
>
50A - HOOKAH LOUNGES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:48:37 PM
Creation date
2/15/2006 11:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
50A
Date
2/21/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />seventy-five percent (75%) or more of gross sales receipts from the <br />sale of tobacco products and tobacco paraphernalia. <br /> <br />G. If hookah parlors are permitted in the City and left unregulated, they will pose <br />a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the <br />following reasons: <br /> <br />1. Hookah parlors established in other cities have been associated with <br />increases in noise, loitering, public drinking, possession of illegal <br />weapons, underage drinking, and arson. <br /> <br />2. Unregulated hookah parlors could exacerbate the inherently <br />dangerous behavior of tobacco use around non-tobacco users; <br />diminish the protection of children from exposure to smoking and <br />tobacco while they increase the potential for minors to associate <br />smoking and tobacco with a healthy lifestyle; and weaken the <br />protection of the public from smoking and tobacco-related pollution. <br /> <br />3. Hookah parlors if allowed in the City under the current state of the <br />City's regulations will have adverse secondary effects on surrounding <br />properties, including but not limited to lowering property values and <br />introducing incompatible land uses to existing neighborhoods. <br /> <br />H. In order to prevent frustration of said studies and the implementation thereof, <br />the public interest, health, safety and welfare require the immediate <br />enactment of this ordinance. The absence of this ordinance would create a <br />serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code <br />amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which <br />may be adopted by the city as a result of the studies in that the establishment <br />or construction of hookah parlors may be in conflict with or frustrate the <br />contemplated updates and revisions to the Code, general plans or specific <br />plans. Moreover, permitting hookah parlors to be established or constructed <br />during said studies and implementation would create impacts on the public <br />health, safety and welfare that the city council, in adopting this ordinance, has <br />found to be unacceptable. <br /> <br />I. In response to the threat of unregulated hookah parlors several cities, <br />including but not limited to the Cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Dublin <br />California, have adopted similar moratoriums or development restrictions. <br />Other cities, such as New York, have simply banned them. <br /> <br />J. The Request for Council Action for this ordinance dated February 21, 2006 <br />and duly signed by the City Manager shall, by this reference, be incorporated <br />herein, and together with this ordinance, any amendments or supplements, <br />and oral testimony constitute the necessary findings for this ordinance. <br /> <br />Ordinance No. NS - <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />50A-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.