My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1701 E. FAIRHAVEN AVE.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
03/06/2006
>
31A - 1701 E. FAIRHAVEN AVE.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:48:21 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 3:41:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
3/6/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br /> <br />I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are <br />adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses <br />following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced <br />information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one <br />involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer <br />should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general <br />standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a <br />project-specific screening analysis). <br /> <br />II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as <br />on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as <br />well as operational impacts. <br /> <br />III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect <br />is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the <br />determination is made, an EIR is required. <br /> <br />IV. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of <br />mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less <br />than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and <br />briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />I. Aesthetics - Would the project: <br /> A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 ~ 0 <br /> B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited 0 0 ~ 0 <br /> to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings <br /> within a state highway? <br /> C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character )if <br /> or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 0 <br /> D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br /> which would adversely affect day or nighttime views f< <br /> in the area? 0 0 0 <br /> <br />db\Env Form CEQA Chklst <br /> <br />3tAn53 <br /> <br />Page 1 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.