My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CA DEPT TRANSPORTATION 17 - 2006
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
>
CA DEPT TRANSPORTATION 17 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 3:25:26 PM
Creation date
3/14/2006 9:31:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
State of California
Contract #
A-2006-017
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
2/6/2006
Expiration Date
2/6/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
District Agreement No. 530 <br />7. If upon review of the aforementioned bids, CITY, by written notice to STATE's <br />District 12 Office, elects to not proceed with PROJECT, thereby causing STATE to <br />reject all bids, CITY agrees to pay STATE for all of STATE's already incurred and all <br />unavoidable costs related to termination of PROJECT incurred by STATE, including <br />all legal costs and damages resulting from rejection of all PROJECT bids. <br />8. If, upon opening of bids for the contract to construct PROJECT, it is found that the <br />lowest responsible bid exceeds the Engineer's Estimate by more than ten percent <br />(10%), STATE and CITY shall consult upon a course of action. If, after fifteen (15) <br />days, a course of action is not agreed upon, this Agreement shall be deemed to be <br />terminated by mutual consent pursuant to Article 10 of this Section III. <br />9. If termination of this Agreement is by mutual consent, CITY will bear one hundred <br />percent (100%) of all PROJECT -related costs incurred by STATE pursuant to this <br />Agreement. <br />10. After award of the construction contract for PROJECT, should CITY, after a request <br />by STATE, not fulfill its funding commitments, STATE shall ensure that all operating <br />roadways are in a safe and satisfactory permanent operating condition and then shall <br />cease work on PROJECT. Costs incurred by STATE pursuant to this Agreement in <br />excess of payment made by CITY will be billed to CITY and are subject to payment <br />by CITY within thirty (30) days. <br />11. During the construction of PROJECT, CITY may, at no cost to STATE, famish a <br />representative, if it so desires. STATE's Resident Engineer and CITY's representative <br />shall cooperate and consult with each other, but the decision of STATE's Resident <br />Engineer shall be final. CITY's assigned representative shall have no direct contact <br />with STATE's contractor, the public, other local agencies, etc., without prior consent <br />of STATE's Resident Engineer. While said representative and STATE's Engineer will <br />cooperate and consult with each other, the decisions of STATE's Resident Engineer <br />shall prevail as final, binding and conclusive in all matters concerning the PROJECT <br />construction contract. <br />12. If unknown existing public and/or private utility facilities are discovered during <br />PROJECT construction, or if there is a significant change required in any approved <br />utility relocation plan, the provisions of STATE's current Standard Specifications <br />Section 8-1.10 (Utilities and Non -Highways Facilities) shall apply. STATE will make <br />all necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for the protection, <br />relocation, or removal of the discovered utility facilities in accordance with STATE's <br />policy and procedure for those facilities located within the limits of work providing for <br />the improvement to the State highway and in accordance with [Local Agency's] policy <br />for those facilities located outside of the limits of work for the improvement to the <br />State highway. The cost of the protection, relocation, or removal shall be apportioned <br />between the owner of the utility facility and CITY in accordance with STATE's policy <br />and procedure. STATE shall require any utility owner performing relocation work in <br />the State highway right of way to obtain an encroachment permit from STATE prior to <br />the performance of said relocation work. The requirements of the most current <br />Revised June 27, 2005 edition 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.