My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - SAMC AMEND SECTION 41
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
04/17/2006
>
75B - SAMC AMEND SECTION 41
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:47:27 PM
Creation date
4/12/2006 1:30:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
4/17/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />--.----.- <br /> <br />cIITOF~ANTA <br />ANA <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />impact <br /> <br />Potentiaily <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Miligation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />II. Agricultural Resources - In determining whether impacts to agricuitural resources are significant <br />environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site <br />Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in <br />assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or <br />Farmiand of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to <br />non-agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and <br />Monitoring Program in the California Resources <br />Agency, Department of Conservation, maintain <br />detailed maps of these and other categories of <br />farmland.) <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a <br />Wiiliamson Contract? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could <br />individuaily or cumulatively resuit in loss of <br />Farmland, to non-agricultural use? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />III. Air Quality - Where availabie, the significance criteria estabiished by the applicable air quality management or <br />pollution controi district may be relied upon to make the fOllowing determinations. Would the project: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Conflict with or obstruct implementation of <br />applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion <br />Management Plan? <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Violate any stationary source air quality standard or <br />contribute to an existing or proposed air quality <br />violation? <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase <br />of any criteria pollutant for which the project region <br />is non-attainment under an applicable federal or <br />state ambient air quality standard (including <br />reieasing emission which exceeds quantitative <br />thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant <br />concentrations? <br /> <br />md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 <br /> <br />7SEit'234 <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />i:8J <br /> <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.