Laserfiche WebLink
Karen Haluza <br />January 5, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />• Electronic copies of the conceptual site plan and elevation drawings. <br />• The Phase I and soils report that have been prepared for the project site. This item <br />was discussed in the January 4" meeting and is to be provided by Shea Homes. <br />• Any information gleaned from meetings with local public service (Police and Fire) or <br />utility providers (Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Electricity, Natural Gas). <br />• Water Supply Assessment (to be provided by the City after preparation of the <br />IS/NOP) <br />• Traffic Report (to be provided by the City after preparation of the IS/NOP) <br />Potential Causes ofDelayin the Project Schedule <br />The following is a general list of the items/events that would cause potential delays in the <br />attached accelerated EIR schedule: <br />• Changes in the number/type of uses to be constructed under the proposed project <br />• Changes in the orientation of proposed structures at the project site. <br />• Changes in vehicular access points (both internal and external), as well as entrances <br />to parking structures. Any modifications of this type would potentially require <br />changes to the traffic report's future traffic volumes which would also require a <br />subsequent reevaluation of the operational noise and air quality analyses. <br />• When providing comments, a consolidated list of comments would be preferable. If <br />this is not possible, EIP will need to understand whose comments will override <br />another's should a conflict of opinion occur. <br />• If the FAR for the Makar portion of the proposed project exceeds the City's <br />established maximum FAR for the current zoning, additional analysis of land use <br />issues beyond what is currently scoped out would be necessary. <br />• Delayed receipt of final versions of the WSA and traffic report. <br />• Executed contract between City and EIP. At the current time, we do not have an <br />executed contract but are operating under an electronic notice to proceed with a not - <br />to -exceed budget. <br />• A large number of comments (greater than 150) received during the public review <br />period for the Draft EIR. <br />• The need for extended review of the Admin Draft EIR, Screencheck Draft FIR, or <br />Admin Draft Final FIR by Shea Homes or the City. <br />• Lack of response from public service or utility providers. <br />EIP ASSOCIATES 12301 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD SUITE 430 LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 <br />Tarp Gan,- 310 265-8132 Fnuin+if. 310 268-8175 E-nmi( !„@eipa.vuai¢ru.ra n, a„m.eipnu......,. ro,n <br />