My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2006-04-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
04/17/2006
>
FULL PACKET_2006-04-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:47:15 PM
Creation date
4/12/2006 2:11:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
404
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approval of the proposed amendment to the single family <br />residential standards would not increase the use of any <br />recreational facilities or result in the significant need for <br />additional recreational facilities, in that the proposed <br />amendment would not involve any activities that would increase <br />the demand for recreational facilities. <br />The amendments to correct, clarify and update residential front <br />yard fences, definitions, second dwellings units, laundromats, <br />vending machines, townhouses, specific development standards and <br />Specific Development No. 40 zone district would not result in <br />significant recreation impacts. <br />XIV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br />B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature <br />E. Result in inadequate emergency access <br />F. Result in inadequate parking capacity <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to the single family <br />residential standards would not result in any traffic impacts, <br />in that the proposed would not involve any activities that would <br />generate vehicle trips, increase the demand for parking, create <br />emergency access constraints or create design hazards to <br />vehicles or pedestrians. However, single-family residential land <br />uses developed under the amended standards could result in <br />traffic and circulation impacts. Through the City's development <br />review process, single-family land uses developed under the <br />amended standards would be evaluated for potential traffic and <br />circulation impacts. <br />The amendments to correct, clarify and update residential front <br />yard fences, definitions, second dwellings units, laundromats, <br />vending machines, townhouses, specific development standards and <br />Specific Development No. 40 zone district would not result in <br />significant traffic and circulation impacts. <br />75Bf~64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.