My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - TTM 2005-11, 2000 E FIRST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
05/01/2006
>
32A - TTM 2005-11, 2000 E FIRST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:46:57 PM
Creation date
4/26/2006 11:54:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32A
Date
5/1/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The project site is situated within an area that is <br />characterized with commercial land uses. The presence of the <br />proposed project would not divide any established neighborhoods <br />or result in any adverse land use compatibility impacts. <br /> <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The general plan designation for the project site is <br />Professional Administrative Office with a maximum Floor Area <br />Ratio of FAR 1.0. The zoning on the project site is General <br />Commercial. <br /> <br />The proposed project is a medical office use with a FAR of .28. <br />The project would be consistent with the Professional <br />Administrative Office General Plan designation and the General <br />Commercial zoning designation on the project site. <br /> <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or <br />natural community plan? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan, the project site is not <br />included within any habitat conservation plan or any natural <br />community conservation plan. Therefore, implementation of the <br />proposed project would not be in conflict with any habitat <br />conservation plan. <br /> <br />X. MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important <br />mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's Updated General Plan Land Use Element <br />EIR, there are no areas in Santa Ana that are designated <br />significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Areas. Therefore, <br />implementation of the proposed project would not result in the <br />loss of any regionally or locally important mineral resource. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />32,A-J5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.