My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LAGUNA NIGUEL, CITY OF 1
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
INACTIVE CONTRACTS (Originals Destroyed)
>
K-L (INACTIVE)
>
LAGUNA NIGUEL, CITY OF 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 9:18:57 AM
Creation date
5/26/2006 3:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
City of Laguna Niguel
Contract #
A-2005-310-11
Agency
Police
Council Approval Date
9/19/2005
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment <br />FY05 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM <br />o Of this amount, up to 10% of FY05 UASI funds may be used to support <br />operational overtime costs incurred at Code Yellow or Orange alert that <br />are associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure <br />sites in UASI jurisdictions. <br />o The remaining 15% of FY05 UASI funds may be used to support <br />operational overtime costs incurred only at Code Orange alert that are <br />associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites <br />in UASI jurisdictions. <br />This guidance also applies to operational overtime costs incurred at National <br />Special Security Events (NSSEs) in UASI jurisdictions, as designated by the <br />Secretary of Homeland Security. <br />States with UASI jurisdictions can use UASI funds retained at the state level to <br />reimburse eligible operational overtime expenses incurred by the state (up to a <br />maximum of 25% of the state share of the UASI grant). However, those activities <br />must directly support increased security measures enacted in the UASI <br />jurisdictions. States should be judicious in the use of federal grant funds when <br />protecting critical infrastructure and should leverage public /private partnerships. <br />States should also consider the use of private assets in the protection of private <br />facilities. <br />In support of these efforts for enhanced capabilities of detecting, deterring, disrupting, <br />and preventing acts of terrorism, costs eligible for reimbursement under this policy are <br />identical to those deemed allowable under previous Code Orange alerts. Therefore, <br />subject to the conditions stated above, states and local governments may use FY05 <br />UASI and LETPP funds to support: <br />• Select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at <br />critical infrastructure sites. Funds may only be used in the following authorized <br />categories: <br />• Backfill and overtime expenses for staffing state or local EOCs <br />• Hiring of contracted security for critical infrastructure sites <br />• Public safety overtime <br />• National Guard deployments to protect critical infrastructure sites, <br />including all resources that are part of the standard National Guard <br />deployment package <br />• Increased border security activities in coordination with U.S. Customs and <br />Border Protection (CBP). <br />Consumable costs, such as fuel expenses, are not allowed except as part of <br />the standard National Guard deployment package. <br />DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY I OFFICE FOR DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS <br />26 <br />H <br />d Y$1 <br />3i <br />Wt <br />vi. <br />Z, <br />o <br />=, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.