My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - CRAZY HORSE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
06/19/2006
>
75A - CRAZY HORSE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:45:53 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 2:17:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
6/19/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />involve dewatering activities. Implementation <br />project would not result in significant <br />underground water supplies. <br /> <br />of the <br />impacts <br /> <br />proposed <br />to any <br /> <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the <br />site or area, including through the alteration of the <br />course of stream or river, or substantially increase the <br />rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would <br />result in flooding on or off-site? <br />D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the <br />capacity of existing or planned stor.m water drainage <br />systems or provide substantial additional sources of <br />polluted run-off? <br /> <br />Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated <br /> <br />The proposed project would not introduce substantial amounts of <br />new impervious surfaces onto the project site. Existing rates of <br />surface water runoff are not anticipated to increase <br />significantly. Through the City's development review process, <br />the Public Works Agency has determined the existing drainage <br />facilities within the project area could provide adequate <br />drainage for the proj ect . However, final drainage plans would <br />still need to be prepared to determine the size and exact <br />location of onsite drain facilities. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measure <br /> <br />. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the proj ect <br />applicant shall submit a final surface water runoff <br />evaluation for review and approval showing existing and <br />proposed facilities and methods of draining the site <br />wi thout exceeding the capacity of any street or adj acent <br />storm drain facility. <br /> <br />F. Place housing within a lOO-year floodplain, as mapped on a <br />federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />G. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would <br />impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, <br />injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as <br />a result of the failure of a levee or dam? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The City of Santa Ana is <br />Insurance Program (NFIP). <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />a participant in the National Flood <br />Communities participating in the NFIP <br /> <br />7 SArA 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.