FULL PACKET_2006-06-19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

be subject to seismic safety standards of the Uniform Building Code. Compliance with the Uniform Building Code along with the incorporation of the design recommendations identified in the project geotechnical investigation would reduce potential seismically induced liquefaction and settlement impacts to a level considered less than significant. A-4. Landslides No Impact The project area is flat without any topographical relief. According to General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no landslide planes or slopes within the project area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts in regards to landslides. B. T~Vould the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Erosion refers to the removal of soil from exposed bedrock surfaces by water or wind. The effects of erosion are intensified with an increase in slope, the narrowing of runoff channels and by the removal of groundcover, which leaves the soil exposed. Construction operations for the propose the clearing, excavation, and grading uncovered soils on the project site coul erosion and sedimentation impacts to onsi facilities. This potential impact could of rain. To reduce potential erosion considered less than significant, the measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure d project would require of onsite soils. The d potentially result in to and offsite drainage increase during periods impacts to a level following mitigation • Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geological feature? 13 7~~-~3