FULL PACKET_2006-06-19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the morning peak hour, and 60 inbound and 41 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. Table 3 Crazy Horse Square Summary of Project Trip Generation Land Use Trip Generation Rates Project Trip Generation ITE Unit Quantit Daily AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Code y In Out In Out Daily In Out In Out Lot 1 Restaurant 931 KSF 8.171 89.95 0.66 0.15 5.02 2.47 735 5 1 41 20 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-44%) 0 0 0 -18 -9 Sub-Total Restaurant 735 5 1 23 11 Retail 820 KSF 4.211 42.94 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.95 181 3 2 8 8 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-SO%) 0 0 0 -4 -4 Sub-Total Retail 181 3 2 4 4 Food 932 KSF 2.47 127.15 5.99 5.53 6.66 4.26 314 15 14 16 11 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-43%) 0 0 0 -7 -5 Sub-Total Food 314 15 14 9 6 Total New Traffic -Lot 1 1,230 23 17 36 21 Lot 2 Coffee 933-2 KSF 1.486 716.00 37.25 35.78 14.97 13.82 1,040 55 53 22 21 Food 932 KSF 2.829 127.15 5.99 5.53 6.66 4.26 360 17 16 19 12 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-43%) 0 0 0 -18 -14 Sub-Total Coffee /Food 1,424 72 69 23 19 Retail 820 KSF 0.987 42.94 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.95 42 1 0 2 2 ITE Pass-By Reduction (PM-50%) 0 0 0 -1 -1 Sub-Total Retail 42 1 0 1 1 Total New Traffic -Lot 2 1,466 73 69 24 20 Ne~- ~'raffic 2,6~b 86 60 41 Project Traffic Trip Distribution Project trip distribution assumptions for the project site were developed, taking into account the site uses and the location of area trip producers, such as employment centers. Trip distribution assumptions are shown on Figure 6 of the traffic analysis. The trip distribution assumptions focus on the project's use of arterials and major intersections in the vicinity of the project. While some drivers may find their way to the site through the Brookhollow development via Brookhollow Drive at Warner Avenue, the trip distribution shown assumes that 33 7~i~q-~~3