My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ANAHEIM, CITY OF - 2005
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
INACTIVE CONTRACTS (Originals Destroyed)
>
A (INACTIVE)
>
ANAHEIM, CITY OF - 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2015 12:39:18 PM
Creation date
6/19/2006 11:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
City of Anaheim
Contract #
A-2005-310-19
Agency
Police
Council Approval Date
9/19/2005
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />FY05 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM <br />X. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANTS <br />A. Program Overview <br />With funds provided through the FY05 EMPG, states have the opportunity to structure <br />individual emergency management programs based on identified needs and priorities <br />for strengthening their emergency management capabilities, while addressing issues of <br />national concern. States have the flexibility to develop intrastate emergency <br />management systems that encourage the building of partnerships which include <br />government, business, volunteer, and community organizations. It is essential that <br />state and local governments coordinate and establish strong working relationships with <br />neighboring jurisdictions, which may include all levels of government, including tribal <br />governments, in developing emergency management capabilities under this grant for <br />joint operations, effective mutual aid and support locally, regionally, state -to -state and <br />nation -wide. <br />Comprehensive emergency management should include local emergency management <br />programs. Local emergency management organizations should remain informed and <br />have the opportunity to provide input to its states' planning processes. Although DHS <br />expects states to include support for their local jurisdictions in its EMPG programs, each <br />state is responsible for determining the appropriate amount of funding to be passed <br />through to support the development or enhancement of local emergency management <br />capabilities. <br />Developing EMPG Work Plans <br />States should use the EMAP Standards structure and NIMS (as published by DHS on <br />March 1, 2004) as a basis for developing work plans and performance evaluations for <br />EMPG. As a condition for receipt of funds, states must comply with FY05 NIMS <br />implementation requirements (see NIMS page 46 for further information). In addition, <br />states are encouraged to begin to move toward compliance with the EMAP standards. <br />Additional information on the EMAP standards is available at <br />http: / /www.emaponline.org /index.cfm; additional information on NIMS is available at <br />http: / /www.fema.gov /nims. Results from other assessments can also serve as a <br />reference, and can include specific targeting of the EMPG to those areas identified as <br />needing improvement. <br />EMPG has a 50% federal and 50% state cost -share cash or in -kind match requirement. <br />In accordance with federal guidelines and DHS Office of General Counsel (OGC) <br />rulings, match requirements are waived for the U.S. Territories of American Samoa, <br />Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. For <br />further information on allowable sources and types of funds, timing of match <br />contributions, and records for match, please consult the OJP Financial Guide, Chapter 3 <br />DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY I OFFICE FOR DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS <br />85 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.