Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br /> <br /> <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />JULY 17, 2006 <br />TITLE <br /> <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />D As Recommended <br />D As Amended <br />D Ordinance on 1;( Reading <br />D Ordinance on 2Cd Reading <br />D Implementing Resolution <br />D Set Public Hearing For <br /> <br />AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL <br />ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER <br />AND SEWER PROJECTS <br /> <br />k/~ <br /> <br />' /..' CI MANAGER <br /> <br />~ <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> <br />CONTINUED TO <br /> <br />FILE NUMBER <br /> <br />Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the <br />Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. and <br />Daniel Boyle Engineering for water and sewer engineering services in an <br />amount not to exceed $300,000 for each firm. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Staff has solicited proposals for water and sewer engineering services from <br />eight qualified civil engineering firms; four firms replied. These services <br />are required to augment City staff to complete the design of water and <br />sewer infrastructure projects in a timely manner. <br /> <br />A committee comprised of personnel from the Public Works Agency reviewed <br />the proposals. The ratings for the four firms are as follows: <br /> <br />FIRM <br /> <br />Rating <br /> <br />1. Daniel Boyle Engineering <br />2. Tetra Tech, Inc. <br />3. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. <br />4. AKM Consulting Engineering <br /> <br />92 <br />92 <br />70 <br />67 <br /> <br />The fee schedules for the two top rated firms were compared and are <br />consistent, reasonable, and in line with staff's estimate. Due to the <br />experience of key personnel, client satisfaction and competitive rates it <br />is recommended that the firms of Daniel Boyle Engineering and Tetra Tech, <br />Inc. be retained for the required services. <br /> <br />25A-1 <br />