My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-1995
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1995
>
03-30-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:04:24 PM
Creation date
5/12/2003 11:49:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/30/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alvarez sketched the history of how infrastructure costs have been funded and noted the cost of <br />improvements has shifted to the developer as a project beneficiary. Alvarez indicated developers <br />pay this cost in the form of exactions which include infrastructure improvements, right-of-way <br />dedications, and impact fees. <br /> <br />INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS <br /> <br />PWA Development Engineer Pam Lucado explained a private project is subject to a Development <br />Processing (DP) review when the project size is at least 500 square feet or the project valuation is <br />at least $20,000 per the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). <br /> <br />Lucado indicated DP reviews include evaluating developer plans, examining current and proposed <br />land uses, assessing the capacity of existing infrastructure, and establishing a nexus between the <br />nature of the impact and the improvements the City prescribes as conditions for approval. <br /> <br />Slides on Shimizu, Adohr Farms, and Northgate were shown and discussed as case studies to <br />illustrate how infrastructure exactions are applied to projects. <br /> <br />RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION <br /> <br />Lucado explained that safety and functionality may require the developer to transfer part of the <br />project site to the City as a right-of-way (ROW) dedication. This allows the City to construct <br />public safety improvements such as walkways and parkways on the dedicated area. Walkways <br />protect pedestrians from traffic hazards, while parkways allow the installation of fire hydrants and <br />street lights. <br /> <br />Functionality refers to the capacity of existing infrastructure to meet the new service demands <br />(e.g., increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic) generated by the project. The City meets those <br />demands by installing traffic signals and other intersection enhancements on the dedicated area. <br /> <br />Slides on Birtcher Xerox Center, Pep Boys, and South Coast Center were shown and discussed as <br />case studies to illustrate how ROW dedications and enhanced intersections are applied to projects. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Richardson requested staff provide Council with a map showing the location of <br />the City's enhanced intersections. <br /> <br />Lucado summarized the Nollan and Dolan Supreme Court decisions. Nollan requires jurisdictions <br />to show a nexus between the nature of the project impact and the prescribed improvements. <br />Dollan requires jurisdictions to establish a "rough proportionality" between the costs of the <br />exactions to the developer and the benefits of the improvements to the public. <br /> <br />In response to Councilmember Moreno's query, Lucado clarified that all private development <br />projects including residential housing are subject to SAMC requirements and that the Planning <br />and Building Agency determined a project's valuation using industry standards. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tern Richardson and Councilmember Moreno requested staff to investigate how the <br />City's 500 square feet-S20,000 valuation thresholds compare with other cities. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 79 MARCH 30, 1995 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.