Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, .; _ <br />., ,., Figure 2 <br />; : <br />, <br />, <br />Hourly Parlung Accumulation Curves ~ t <br />for'Iridiv><dual Larid-uses ''' ' ~ • ° ~ ~~ •~` <br />t y t!". <br />1E0 Nt' I~(N <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />' ,'.~ I .~r_,.:~ .,,l tl r. .. ::..Aar \ • ~l. <br />p 'r <br />• <br /> <br />~ ~ ~ ~ . <br />• <br /> <br />L ~ ~ ,~~, J ~~RETAIL <br />~ ~ <br /> ~ ~CINfNA <br />~ _ ~ <br /> <br />O ~ <br />OffIC! <br />~ <br /> ~ <br />x'10 ~ <br /> ~ AfSTAURANT _ <br />I <br />10 .., <br />! <br />t ! ! +a n +z t z a ~ ! e T s ! +o <br />NOON <br />NOUA OF THE OAY WEEKDAY <br />,EE <br /> <br /> <br />,a <br />\ RESIDENTIAL / <br />~ <br />C • / <br />I <br />F !° <br /> <br /> , <br />~ ~CINENA <br />• <br />u ~ <br />t <br />i <br /> <br />Y ~ ~ <br />AFTAIL <br />°° <br /> <br />~ <br />~ ~F~r~u~A~ ~ r <br />~_ <br />o ~ ~~ <br /> <br /> ~ •. <br />~ ~ <br />>m •' <br /> OFflCE <br />~ <br />10 °'. <br />! _ <br />._ . T e 0 .'+. 10 T 11,'' N+~ ~ + '„' a 7 ~.r r4 6 ~" ! ' 7 '' ! ~~ ! ' 1E" - <br />"~MOUfl OF TN! DAY' . -~ <br />aATUflDAY ~': <br />, <br />, <br />31~r~7 <br />'/ -__ =, , <br />;t .: , ~; <br />~, <br />~......~ <br />.....r,.... <br />Shared parking may occur in suburban developments if walking <br />distances are not far and Land uses are Functionally related. <br />transit use, thus representing the maximum parking <br />accumulation occurring on a given day. Hourly ac- <br />cumulation curves (developed from hourly counts at <br />freestanding developments) for each individual I~-nd <br />use (see Figure 2) indicate the variation in parking <br />accumulation throughottt a given day. Seasonal vari- <br />ation in parking demand at each land use (see Figure <br />3) was developed from management data supplied <br />by developers and in-house historical data. The peak <br />parking demands calculated from the parking de- <br />mand factors in Figure 1 correspond to 100 percent <br />of peak parking accumulation for each land use indi- <br />cated on the hourly curves in Figure 2 and the <br />monthly data in Figure 3. <br />By combining the results for single land uses with <br />survey data for mixed-use developments, it was pos- <br />sible to document the effects of shared parking on <br />total parking space requirements. This vas shown in <br />terms of the reduced number of parking spaces <br />needed to serve peak activity periods. <br />The survey data also disclosed the potential for <br />multiple "levels of reduction" in parking space based <br />on the different impacts of time and inter-land use <br />,+ o~._.~~-.1___ moo! rmr~nrn n nrrm <br />