My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2006-10-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
10/16/2006
>
FULL PACKET_2006-10-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:43:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:57:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
10/16/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />CEQA Compliance <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />D. Create or contribute runoff water which would ^ ^ ^ <br /> exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br /> stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial <br /> additional sources of polluted run-off? <br />E. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ^ <br /> mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br /> Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br /> delineation map? <br />F. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which ^ ^ ^ <br /> would impede or redirect flood flows? <br />G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ^ <br /> mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br /> Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br /> delineation map? <br />IX. Land Use and Planning -Would the project: <br />A. Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ^ <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ^ ® ^ ^ <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ^ ^ ^ <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />X. Mineral Resources- Would the project: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ^ ^ ^ <br />important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br />on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land <br />use plan? <br />75~t;~6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.