HUTTON CENTRE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. 2. - PLANNI_, COHMISSION - I'EBRUARY 26, 1990 A. AMEIlDMEIlT APPLICATION NO. filed by Hutton Development 300-320 North Flower from Specific Development Plan No. two office buildings; 1036 AND SPECIFIC DEVELOPMEllT PLAN NO. 55 eompany to rezone property located at the R-2, R-3, C-l and CD Districts to the 55 District to allow the construction of - and - B. DEVELOPMEIlT AGREEMEIiT NO. 90-1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND THE HUTTON DEVELOPMEIlT COMPANY for the Hutton Civic Center Plaza Development that is proposed to be constructed at 300-320 North Flower in the Specific Development Plan No, 55 District. In case planner Sergio Klotz's absence, Jeffry Rice provided each of the Commissioners with a copy of the Grant Deed and the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the Community Redevelopment Agency and the Hutton Development Co., Inc. He discussed how each of the concerns that the developer and the Commissioners had expressed at the Regular Meeting of February 12 had been addressed in the new staff report. Among these were the traffic management programs, Public Works Agency conditions for a six-month review after occupancy of Phase I, the FAR, phasing and additional review by the Commission, ancillary commercial uses, building setbacks, accessory structures, the parking structure, the heliport, mitigation measures, and a jail or holding cells. In addition, the following statement had been added to Page 2 of the Grant Deed restriction: "In any event, no portion of the Property shall be used as a jailor holding facility for prisoners or arrestees of any governmental agency. Of Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Amendment Application No. 1036 and Specific Development Plan No. 55 as conditioned through the operational standards; and recommend that the City Council approve Development Agreement No. 90-1. Commissioner Sizemore expressed concern for having a multi-story building next to residences and questioned how it was possible to have a negative declaration on an EIR. He expressed further concern for the potential impacts of traffic, there being no findings of overriding considerations, air quality, the kinds of chemicals used by the Forensic Department, and whether or not they were toxic or hazardous. He questioned how many trips per day would be generated. Pam Lucado responded that 3,240 trips per day, two-way traffic, would be generated by this project. Commissioner Hanna questioned the Do-jail clause and Richard Lay responded that the Grand Deed was a covenant the Redevelopment Agency to Hutton Development. appropriate to put the clause in the deed than in the because the County is not subject to the City's Redevelopment would enforce the deed. the Grant Deed. in deed from It was more staff report, zoning laws. Savoy M. Bellavia, 201 E. Sandpointe, Suite 300, Santa Ana, representing Hutton Development Co., the applicant, stated reviewed the staff report and new conditions, and he was in with them. He had no additional information or question~. CA 92707, that he had agreement Chaiman