My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NS-2728
Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2000 - 2010 (NS-2416-2812)
>
2006 (NS-2707 - NS-2730)
>
NS-2728
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:00:49 PM
Creation date
10/19/2006 1:09:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Ordinance
Doc #
NS-2728
Date
10/16/2006
Destruction Year
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />dispensaries and the potential establishment of new medical marijuana dispensaries <br />in the City. <br /> <br />F. Given these concerns, the City Council has requested, in adopting the moratorium <br />ordinance, that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of the General Plan <br />and Chapter 41 if the Code to classify medical marijuana dispensaries and <br />determine whether such businesses should be permitted in the City and if so, where, <br />and under what conditions. <br /> <br />G. Without adoption of an extension to the moratorium ordinance, properties in the City <br />would quiCkly receive entitlements to establish medical marijuana dispensaries <br />despite the fact that the city council has determined that the Code is in need of <br />updating and has directed that a study be done to recommend new standards and <br />revise the Code to address concerns created by medical marijuana dispensaries. <br /> <br />H. It has come to the City Council's attention that at least one individual has <br />approached city staff seeking entitlements to establish a medical marijuana <br />dispensary <br /> <br />I. The City is not, at this time, able to determine if medical marijuana dispensaries can <br />legally be established within the City for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1. In 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 ("the <br />Act"), codified as Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, et seq. <br /> <br />2. The intent of Proposition 215 was to enable persons who are in need of <br />medical marijuana for medical purposes to obtain and use it under limited, <br />specified circumstances. <br /> <br />3. On January 1, 2004 SB 420, codified as Health and Safety Code Section <br />113627 et seq., was enacted by the Legislature to clarify the scope of the Act <br />and to allow cities and counties to adopt and enforce rules and regulations <br />consistent with SB 420 and the Act. <br /> <br />4. The Santa Ana Municipal Code does not address in any manner medical <br />marijuana dispensaries. <br /> <br />5. Recently, the United States Supreme Court addressed medical marijuana use <br />in Gonzales v Raich (2005) 125 S. Ct. 2195. In Raich, the Court held that the <br />federal government has the power to regulate and criminalize medical <br />marijuana use and legally does so. <br /> <br />6. The federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. Section 801 et seq., <br />classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug because of its high potential for <br />abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safe <br />use. The manufacture, distribution, or possession of a Schedule I drug is a <br />criminal offense under the Controlled Substances Act. <br /> <br />Ordinance No. NS-2728 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.