My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NS-2735
Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2000 - 2010 (NS-2416-2812)
>
2007 (NS-2731 - NS-2760)
>
NS-2735
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:00:27 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 4:31:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Ordinance
Doc #
NS-2735
Date
2/5/2007
Destruction Year
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />if the toxins are water soluble, but tar isn't, and tar contains the <br />carcinogens. We believe that, compared to the typical cigarette smoker, <br />waterpipe smokers are exposed to larger total amounts of nicotine, carbon <br />monoxide and certain other toxins. And because the tobacco is burning at <br />a lower temperature, it is more tolerable to inhale deeply, and in fact you <br />need more force to pull air through the high resistance of the water <br />pathway. That means the tobacco smoke can be penetrating deeper in a <br />person's respiratory tract than cigarette smoke does. The damage could <br />be even worse than seen in cigarette smokers, but we haven't done <br />studies long enough to quantify the true cancer risk." <br /> <br />10. According to Dr. Loffredo, another concern is that hookah use may <br />represent a loophole around city and state laws banning smoking in public <br />places. <br /> <br />11. While California Labor Code section 6404.5 generally bans indoor <br />smoking at restaurants and bars, it exempts smoking inside retail or <br />wholesale tobacco shops and private smokers' lounges. It is unclear how <br />substantial the sale of tobacco for offsite consumption must be to qualify <br />for this exemption. While the City is currently studying this issue, the <br />Public Health Institute's Technical Assistance Legal Center, funded by the <br />California Department of Health Services, recommends that this exception <br />should only be available to a business that derives seventy-five percent <br />(75%) or more of gross sales receipts from the sale of tobacco products <br />and tobacco paraphernalia. <br /> <br />H. If hookah parlors are permitted in the City and left unregulated, they will pose a <br />serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following <br />reasons: <br /> <br />1. Hookah parlors established in other cities have been associated with <br />increases in noise, loitering, public drinking, possession of illegal <br />weapons, underage drinking, and arson. <br /> <br />2. Unregulated hookah parlors could exacerbate the inherently dangerous <br />behavior of tobacco use around non-tobacco users; diminish the <br />protection of children from exposure to smoking and tobacco while they <br />increase the potential for minors to associate smoking and tobacco with a <br />healthy lifestyle; and weaken the protection of the public from smoking <br />and tobacco-related pollution. <br /> <br />3. Hookah parlors if allowed in the City under the current state of the City's <br />regulations will have adverse secondary effects on surrounding properties, <br />including but not limited to lowering property values and introducing <br />incompatible land uses to existing neighborhoods. <br /> <br />I. In order to prevent frustration of said studies and the implementation thereof, the <br />public interest, health, safety and welfare require the immediate enactment of this <br /> <br />Ordinance No. NS-2735 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.