My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1715 NORTH BRISTROL ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
03/05/2007
>
31A - 1715 NORTH BRISTROL ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:41:25 PM
Creation date
2/28/2007 12:21:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
3/5/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />anf^ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Re~,~~sto <br />E nvi ron menta'lit~1iIj:kl ist <br /> <br />" "lk' , ~':: '.',. ,.r.{f;,:.,~", <br />For CEtlA:~fttppliance <br />'.--;.. ,.',.,", _,.... ,._....4.1......., '"'" <br /> <br />Site design Best Management Practices (BMP) <br /> <br />c. Applicable Routine Source Control BMP <br /> <br />d. Selecting and sizing the Treatment Control BMP <br /> <br />e. Mechanisms by which funding for long-term operation and maintenance of all structural <br />BMP will be provided <br /> <br />f. Operation and Maintenance Plan to describe the long-term operation and maintenance <br />requirements of all applicable structural BMP and to identify the entity in charge of <br />implementation <br /> <br />· The proposed project would be subject to City of Santa Ana Federal Clean Water Protection <br />Enterprise Fees. <br /> <br />B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater <br />recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local <br />groundwater table level. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed project would not interfere with ground water recharge because the project area is not <br />located in an area that is known to recharge the ground water system. Additionally, construction <br />operations for the proposed project would not encroach onto the underground water basin. <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to any underground water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of <br />surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off-site? <br /> <br />D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run- <br />off? <br /> <br />Less than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The project site is located within an urbanized area with improved drainage facilities. The proposed <br />project would not introduce additional impervious surfaces unto the project site. There would be no <br />significant increase in the surface water flows generated from the project site because the site is currently <br />imperious and the project would just replace similar materials. <br /> <br />F. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard <br />Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />G. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />H. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard <br />Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />31A~7 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.