My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:32:59 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 9:35:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 24, 2025 <br />The Honorable Valerie Amezcua <br />Mayor, City of Santa Ana - vamezcua@santa-ana.org <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Dear Mayor Amezcua, <br />Re: Opposition to proposed Specific Development No. 84 Transit Zoning Code rezoning <br />(Logan and Lacy neighborhoods) <br />On behalf of the Board and Members of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce, I am writing to <br />express our strong opposition to the City of Santa Ana's proposed Transit Zoning Code, Specific <br />Development Number 84 ordinance in its Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. Specifically, we are <br />concerned about the proposed removal of the existing light (M-1) and heavy (M-2) industrial <br />overlays in these neighborhoods, which we believe would have a profoundly adverse impact on <br />long-established businesses many of which are owner/operator small and medium-sized <br />enterprises vital to our local economy. <br />The removal of the industrial overlays would disrupt a vital part of our community that has <br />supported a wide range of downstream businesses for decades. Many of the impacted enterprises <br />serve as key employers, providing jobs and contributing to the diverse character and history of <br />the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods. By removing these industrial designations, the City risks <br />displacing these businesses and undermining the livelihoods and retirement plans of <br />owner/operators who have invested time, effort and resources in both neighborhoods. <br />Instead of effectively punishing existing businesses in the two industrial overlay zones, the City <br />should strictly target "bad actors" in the M-2 heavy industrial zone that are producing noxious <br />emissions. <br />Here are a few specific concerns that we would like to highlight for your attention: <br />1.) Impact on Small Businesses: Many of the businesses in the affected areas rely on industrial <br />zoning and its inherent industrial uses to operate effectively. The removal of the two <br />industrial overlays could force these businesses to either close or relocate, disrupting long- <br />standing operations and the local economy. This will disproportionately affect <br />owner/operator businesses that have become an integral part of the community. In addition, <br />because the ordinance restricts the expansion or modification of existing industrial facilities, <br />growing businesses that require greater space will not be able to expand the physical size of <br />their buildings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.