My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 - Agreement for Pavement Managment Program Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Item 19 - Agreement for Pavement Managment Program Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:37:21 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 2:22:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
19
Date
4/1/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o' CTA &GO Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines <br />Local Tax Dollars at Work <br />Any findings that may compromise data integrity and consistency should be discussed and <br />corrected. Examples of these include differences in survey methods from the last update <br />(e.g. changing from windshield to walking surveys), collecting additional distress types and unique <br />situations that may not lend themselves to existing condition survey procedures <br />(e.g. gap -graded mixes, edge cracking with unpaved shoulders). <br />Prior to performing any work, local jurisdictions must review the QA/QC plan with inspection <br />personnel. <br />A copy of the QA/QC plan must be submitted to OCTA together with the PMP certification. <br />Re -inspections <br />As part of any QA/QC process, it is essential to re -inspect portions of the network with different <br />personnel than those performing the condition surveys. Re -inspections should be performed <br />within one month of the original date of collection as pavement data will change with time, and <br />during the winter, may change very rapidly. <br />The data to be re -inspected should include distress types, severities and quantities collected <br />during the survey. At least 5% of the pavement sections should be re -inspected. <br />The selected sections for re -inspections should be representative of the local agency's network. <br />This should include sections from: <br />• All functional classifications (i.e. MPAH and residential/local) <br />All surface types (i.e. AC and PCC) <br />• Entire range of pavement conditions ( i.e. good, fair, poor) <br />• All significant changes in PCI (i.e. sections with more than ±10 PCI points a year with no <br />plausible explanations should be targeted for re -inspections) <br />• All inspectors <br />• Different geographical areas <br />Acceptability Criteria <br />In general, inspectors should identify distress types accurately 95% of the time. Linear <br />measurements should be considered accurate when they are within ±10% if re -measured, and <br />area measurements should be considered accurate when they are within ±20% if re -measured. <br />For the data to be acceptable, 90% of the re -inspected sections must be within ±10 PCI points. <br />If the results of the re -inspections do not meet the above criteria, all inspections should be <br />immediately halted and any differences should be identified and discussed. Corrective actions <br />should be taken immediately. The local jurisdiction should then perform re -inspections of an <br />additional 5% of the pavement sections. <br />Effective March 2024 2-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.