My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 - Agreement for Pavement Managment Program Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Item 19 - Agreement for Pavement Managment Program Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:37:21 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 2:22:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
19
Date
4/1/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o' CTA &GO Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines <br />Local Tax Dollars at Work <br />Chapter 2 - Pavement Management Plan Guidelines <br />These guidelines and procedures are necessary for Orange County agencies to implement and <br />update their PMPs with respect to conducting condition surveys. This is required to certify <br />conformance with the criteria stated in OCTA's Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a <br />PMP be in place and maintained to qualify for an allocation of net revenues generated from M2. <br />A copy of Ordinance No. 3 is available from OCTA. PMP Certification is part of the submittal <br />required for each agency (see Appendix A). <br />The pavement management guidelines are discussed under the following categories: <br />1. Condition Survey Protocols <br />2. Inspection Frequency <br />3. Countywide Assessment Standards <br />4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan <br />5. Re -inspections <br />6. Prequalification/Calibration of Inspectors <br />7. Pavement Management Software Training <br />8. Pavement Management Data Files <br />Condition Survey Protocols <br />In 1998, OCTA adopted condition survey protocols that required the collection of certain surface <br />distresses as a minimum for both asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete pavements. <br />These distresses were common to the variety of pavement management systems then in use by <br />Orange County local agencies. Based on the usage of a common county -wide software, it is now <br />possible to include all of the distresses in ASTM Standard D6433 "Standard Practice for Roads <br />and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys" in these Guidelines. These surface <br />distresses are as follows: <br />Asphalt Concrete (AC) <br />1. Alligator or Fatigue Cracking <br />2. Bleeding <br />3. Block Cracking <br />4. Bumps and Sags <br />5. Corrugation <br />6. Depression <br />7. Edge Cracking <br />8. Joint Reflection Cracking <br />9. Lane/ Shoulder Drop-off <br />10. Longitudinal Cracking <br />11. Patching and Utility Cut Patching <br />12. Polished Aggregate <br />13. Potholes <br />14. Railroad Crossing <br />Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) <br />1. Blowup/ Buckling <br />2. Corner Break <br />3. Divided Slab <br />4. Durability ("D") Cracking <br />5. Faulting <br />6. Joint Seal Damage <br />7. Lane/ Shoulder Drop -Off <br />8. Linear Cracking <br />9. Patching, Large And Utility Cuts <br />10. Patching, Small <br />11. Polished Aggregate <br />12. Popouts <br />13. Pumping <br />14.Punchout <br />15. Rutting <br />15. Railroad Crossing <br />16. Shoving <br />16. Scaling <br />17. Slippage Cracking <br />17. Shrinkage Cracks <br />18. Swell <br />18. Spalling, Corner <br />19. Raveling <br />19. Spalling, Joint <br />20. Weathering (Surface Wear) <br />Effective March 2024 2-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.