Laserfiche WebLink
ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) <br />April 1, 2025 <br />Page 4 <br />application of the industrial overlay zones within the TZC, the implementation of the new <br />General Plan land use designations immediately resulted in zoning inconsistencies and <br />land use conflicts with the new General Plan. <br />Since establishment of the TZC, and specifically in the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, <br />industrial uses have remained, changed ownership, undergone expansions or <br />intensifications, and have continued to create numerous land use conflicts and <br />disturbances that affect surrounding residential communities. Specifically, in the Logan <br />neighborhood alone, these land uses create quality of life, health and safety, and other <br />trespass issues for residential properties that often directly abut these industrial land <br />uses. These issues include odors, dust, traffic, noise, vibrations, and other documented <br />impacts that have taken place for nearly a decade and a half despite the change to the <br />new General Plan land use designations. <br />Historically Disadvantaged Communities and Senate Bill (SB 1000 <br />Prior to the adoption of the TZC, the City permitted industrial uses within the Logan and <br />Lacy neighborhoods in close proximity to sensitive land uses such as residences and <br />schools. The Logan neighborhood represents one of Orange County's oldest barrios, <br />established as early as 1886, and was one of the few areas where Mexicans and those <br />of Mexican descent could purchase land due to racially restrictive covenants during the <br />first half of the 20t" century. Further, as a neighborhood, the area was established before <br />the modern practice of separating or regulating impactful land uses, also known as <br />zoning. The Logan neighborhood itself was largely settled by 1900, before the practice of <br />zoning was enshrined by Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. By that time, the <br />neighborhood contained a mix of residential, industrial, commercial, and related land <br />uses, in some cases side -by -side, with issues further exacerbated by rail lines, fuel <br />storage depots, and the construction of the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) between 1947 and <br />1956. <br />Comprehensive data analysis and mapping tools generated by the Office of <br />Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and California Environmental <br />Protection Agency (CaIEPA), the Center for Diseases Control/Agency for Toxic <br />Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), the United States Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA), and California Healthy Places Index (HPI) reveal concerning <br />information regarding environmental conditions impacting residents in the Logan and <br />Lacy neighborhoods. Recent CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data confirms that these <br />neighborhoods rank at 90% or above among California's most pollution -burdened <br />communities, with Environmental Justice (EJ) maps showing higher exposure to <br />Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5, Air Toxics Cancer Risk, Hazardous Waste Proximity, Diesel <br />Particulate Matter, and Toxic Releases to Air. This information is included as Exhibit 4 to <br />this staff report. These multiple sources of environmental exposure and pollution burden <br />communities of color, including the Logan and Lacy neighborhoods, present an alarming <br />set of challenges that affect residents' quality of life and life expectancy with continued <br />heavy industrial uses nearby. <br />