My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1044 EAST FOURTH
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
04/16/2007
>
31A - 1044 EAST FOURTH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:40:26 PM
Creation date
4/11/2007 12:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
4/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Although these land use categories do not precisely reflect the proposed use, they nevertheless <br /> <br /> <br />provide an indication of the parking associated with typical industrial users, particularly for the industrial <br /> <br /> <br />park classification. Examination of Table 1 reveals the average peak parking demand for industrial uses <br /> <br /> <br />is Ll8 spaces per TSF. The proposed project will provide parking at the rate of Ll8 spaces (104 spaces <br /> <br /> <br />for 88,000 sf). It should be noted these figures represent the maximum parking demand that occurs at any <br /> <br /> <br />one time and not the "average" throughout the day. <br /> <br />Case Study Results <br /> <br />There is an existing Contractor's Warehouse at 601 E. Imperial Highway which consists of two <br /> <br /> <br />buildings totaling 108,400 sf located in an industrial area in the City of La Habra. This location is the <br /> <br /> <br />closest similar facility to that planned in Santa Ana, and its peak parking was observed for six days (two <br /> <br /> <br />Fridays, two Saturdays and two Sundays) in November and December 2006, and for one Monday in <br /> <br /> <br />January 2007. The results of those parking observations revealed an absolute maximum parking demand <br /> <br /> <br />of 42 spaces. That peak parking total consisted of 35 vehicles in the general customer parking lot and <br /> <br /> <br />another seven contractor vehicles parked in the building supply area loading lumber and other materials. <br /> <br />Another source of parking demand information is available from Parsons Transportation Group, <br /> <br /> <br />Inc. who conducted case studies in 2005 of two Contractor's Warehouse Stores located in Pomona and <br /> <br />Montebello. This study (copy attached) is quite comprehensive with regard to parking demand for this <br /> <br /> <br />specific use and delves deeply into numbers of sales transactions and surrounding location (industrial <br /> <br /> <br />versus retail) as well as actual parking counts to produce recommended parking guidelines. Summarizing <br /> <br /> <br />briefly what this exhaustive study found was that the maximum parking demand at anytime was 88 spaces <br /> <br /> <br />at Montebello and 99 spaces at Pomona. These stores are 76,000 sf and 65,000 sf, respectively. The <br /> <br /> <br />report concludes that the absolute maximum peak parking demand on any day of the year is 88 spaces for <br /> <br /> <br />Montebello and 116 spaces in Pomona. The Montebello store more closely approximates that which is <br /> <br /> <br />proposed in Santa Ana because both of its size (76,000 sf) and its location in an industrial area. The <br /> <br /> <br />Pomona store with its somewhat higher parking demand is situated in a conventional large retail center. <br /> <br /> <br />The Parson's report provides an overall recommendation of one parking space per 950 sf (1.05 spaces per <br /> <br />TSF) for this type of use located in an industrial area. <br /> <br />Santa Ana HD Supply Repair and Remodel Site <br />Traffic and Parking Analysis <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Austin-Foust Associates. Inc. <br />I07300lrpt.doc <br /> <br />31A-62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.