Laserfiche WebLink
WORK STUDY SESSIONS <br /> <br />Violeta Sandoval <br />Chris Guenzler <br />William Korthof <br />Mike Metzler <br />Patrick Murphy <br />Lisa Rosen <br />Jane Reifer <br /> <br />Amalia Aguilar <br />Linda Lee Grau <br />Vivien Richardson <br /> <br />Paul Giles <br />Daniel Walker <br />Otto Bade <br />James Kendrick <br />Enriqueta Ramos <br />John Hanna <br />Lisa Woolery <br /> <br /> Against <br />Wayne King <br />Chris Emo <br />Linda Lou Kestin <br /> <br />Ben Holt <br />Jason Strickland <br />Paul Torres <br />Rick Manzano <br />Marti Reiter <br />Veronica Perez <br />Richard Neill (for <br />study) <br /> <br />Bill Todd <br />Shyam Krishnamurthy <br />Jack Mallinckrodt <br />Yolanda Navarro <br /> <br />THE COUNCIL RECESSED AT 9:00 P.M. AND RECONVENED AT 9:25 P.M. WITH <br />ALL MEMBERS PRESENT <br /> <br />Council debate ensued. Councilmember Alvarez thanked all the speakers <br />and noted that the largest decision relative to the Centerline project was <br />not under consideration during tonight's meeting. The decision today <br />would allow evidence to be collected and analyzed so that a final decision <br />could be made based on the analysis and results of the engineering study. <br />Councilmember Alvarez moved, seconded by Councilmember Bist that the <br />Mayor be authorized to sign a joint letter in support of a preliminary <br />engineering study for the Centerline light rail proposed alignment for the <br />Cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGuigan stated that the proposal involves a different <br />route from the alignment on Main Street previously proposed and <br />considered by the City Council. She noted that she had not had sufficient <br />opportunity to analyze the changed route and moved that the matter be <br />continued two weeks to allow Councilmembers to review the new <br />proposal. Councilmember Franklin seconded this motion, and stated that <br />the continuance would allow members the chance to gain more facts, and <br />would also allow business owners on Bristol Street more time for input <br />relative to the proposed route. Discussion continued and members <br />debated the merits of the motions to continue the matter or support the <br />preliminary engineering study. Following the debate the substitute motion <br />to continue the matter two weeks was considered: <br /> <br />Substitute <br />Motion: Continue the item to November 5, 200'1. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 385 OCTOBER 15, 2001 <br /> <br /> <br />