My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH MASSAGE MORATORIUM
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
07/02/2007
>
75C - PH MASSAGE MORATORIUM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:39:01 PM
Creation date
6/27/2007 10:31:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75C
Date
7/2/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
review of Chapter 22 of the Code should to determine how it should be <br />amended to fully protect the City. <br />E. Without adoption of this ordinance, properties in the City would quickly <br />receive entitlements to establish massage parlors, expand existing massage <br />parlors or persons would obtain permits to operate as massage technicians, <br />despite the fact that the city council has determined that the Code is in need <br />of updating and has directed that a study be done to recommend new <br />standards and revise the Code to address concerns created by new and <br />expanded permits for massage related activities. <br />F. In all of calendar year 2006, the City received only seven applications for <br />massage related permits. <br />G. But in the month prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. NS-2744 alone, over <br />23 individuals sought applications for massage related permits from the City. <br />H. This upswing closely followed the March 2007 raid by the Orange County <br />District Attorney and the police departments of Orange and Anaheim of ten <br />facilities (massage parlors or acupuncture clinics) in Anaheim, Orange, Tustin <br />and Dana Point as being alleged fronts for prostitution. <br />I. While some massage parlors are beneficial to the community and offer <br />needed services, others in southern California have been associated with a <br />number of detrimental impacts such as prostitution, late hours of operation, <br />reduced property values and noise. <br />J. Chapter 22 of the Code, which regulates massage establishments and <br />massage technicians and is enforced by the Police Department, has been <br />substantially unchanged since 1976. For comparison, Anaheim, Orange and <br />Costa Mesa have all updated their massage regulations within the last four <br />years. <br />K. If massage parlors are permitted in the City and left as currently regulated, <br />they will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare <br />for the reasons stated above. <br />L. In order to prevent frustration of said studies and the implementation thereof, <br />the public interest, health, safety and welfare require the immediate <br />enactment of this ordinance. The absence of this ordinance would create a <br />serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code <br />amendments or general plan amendments which may be adopted by the city <br />as a result of the studies in that the establishment or construction of massage <br />parlors may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and <br />revisions to the Code, general plans or specific plans. Moreover, permitting <br />massage parlors to be established or expanded, or new massage technicians <br />Ordinance No. NS - XXXX <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />75C-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.