Laserfiche WebLink
Copper <br />The PHG for copper is 170 ug/L. There is no MCL for Copper. Instead the 90s' <br />percentile value of all samples from household taps in the distribution system cannot exceed an <br />Action Level of 1300 ug/L for copper. <br />The category of health risk for copper is gastrointestinal imtation. Numerical health risk <br />data on copper have not yet been provided by OEHHA, the State agency responsible for <br />providing that information. <br />All of our source water samples for copper in 2006 were less than the PHG. Based on <br />extensive sampling of our distribution system in 2006, our 90`h percentile value for copper was <br />200 ug/L. <br />Our water system is in full compliance with the Federal and State Lead and Copper Rule. <br />Based on our extensive sampling, it was determined according to State Regulatory requirements <br />that we meet the Action Levels for copper. Therefore, we aze deemed by CDHS to have <br />"Optimized Corrosion Control" for our system. <br />In general, optimizating corrosion control is considered to be the best available <br />technology to deal with corrosion issues and with any lead or copper findings. We continue to <br />monitor our water quality pazameters that relate to corrosively, such as pH, hazdness, alkalinity, <br />and total dissolved solids. Action will be taken if necessary to maintain our system in an <br />"Optimized Corrosion Control" condition. <br />Since we aze meeting the "Optimized Corrosion Control" requirements, it is not prudent <br />to initiate additional corrosion control treatment as it involves the addition of other chemicals, <br />and there could be additional water quality issues raised. Therefore, no estimate of cost has been <br />included. <br />Arsenic <br />The PHG for arsenic is 0.004 ug/L. The MCL for azsenic is 10 ug/L. We have detected <br />Arsenic in 3 of our 20 wells at levels ND - 3.2 ug/L. The levels detected were below the MCL. <br />The category of health risk associated with Arsenic, and the reason that a drinking water standazd <br />was adopted for it, is that people who drink water containing Arsenic above the MCL throughout <br />their lifetime could experience an increased risk of cancer. The 10 ug/L MCL established by the <br />USEPA if complied with should have no health effect. The numerical risk for cancer for water <br />containing Arsenic at the PHG level of 0.004 ug/L is one case in 1,000,000. The large system <br />BAT for Arsenic to lower the levels below the PHG is Ion Exchange. Total water production for <br />all affected wells is 7,260 gallons per minute. Based on the USEPA studies, the initial cost to <br />treat one thousand gallons of water at 80 percent removal efficiency for lazge water systems <br />ranges from $0.50 to $0.65. The on going cost for the treatment ranges from $0.50 to $0.65 per <br />thousand gallons of water treated. For the City of Santa Ana, the estimated cost to install such <br />treatment systems (Ion Exchange) ranges between $6.45 and $20.0 Million. The cost to operate <br />the treatment facilities will range from $6.45 to $7.9 million per yeaz. The cost to build the <br />treatment facilities would result in an assumed increased to each customer or $18.53 to $57.45 in <br />the first yeaz and from $18.50 to $22.70 per customer annually. <br />3 <br />75D-5 <br />