Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- ~ - Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> Less Than. <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ^ ^ ^ <br />the site or area, including through the alteration of <br />the course of stream or river, or substantially <br />increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a <br />manner which would result in flooding on or off- <br />site? <br />D. Create or contribute runoff water which would ^ ^ ® ^ <br />exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide <br />substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? <br />E. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ® ^ <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br />F. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which ^ ^ ® ^ <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br />G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ® ^ <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br />IX. Land Use and Planning -Would the project: <br />A. Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ^ <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, ^ ^ ® ^ <br />or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ^ ^ ^ <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />California Palms May 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-9 <br />75 D ~~ ~ das ores o~ <br />