My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
07/16/2007
>
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:38:39 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 1:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ \ ~ Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ^ ^ ® ^ <br />number of people? <br />IV. Biological Resources -Would the project <br />A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly ^ ^ ^ <br /> or through habitat modifications, on any species <br /> identified as a candidate, sensitive or special <br /> status species in local or regional plans, policies or <br /> regulations or by the California Department of Fish <br /> and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? <br />B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian ^ ^ ^ <br /> habitat or natural community identified in local or <br /> regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the <br /> California Department of fish and Game or U.S. <br /> Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands ^ ^ ^ <br /> (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, <br /> coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination <br /> with the known or probable impacts of other <br /> activities through direct removal, filling hydrological <br /> interruption, or other means? <br />D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ^ ^ ^ <br /> protecting biological resources, such as tree <br /> preservation policy or ordinance? <br />V. Cultural Resources -Would the project: <br />A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ^ <br /> significance of a historical resource as defined in <br /> Section 15064.5? <br />B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ^ <br /> significance of a unique archaeological resource <br /> pursuant to define Section 15064.5? <br />C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique ^ ^ ^ <br /> paleontological resource or site? <br /> <br />California Palms May 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-6 <br /> 75 D-63 J8S 0296.0] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.