My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
07/16/2007
>
FULL PACKET_2007-07-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:38:39 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 1:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2007
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Schools <br />Less Than Significant Impact. School services in the City are provided by the <br />Santa Ana Unified School District. The demand for new schools is generally <br />associated with population increases or impacts on existing schools. Although it is <br />unlikely that the population on site would increase, it is possible that the increase in <br />permanent housing provided by the proposed project may increase the number of <br />children housed at the project site. If it is assumed that no children currently live on <br />site and that the average family in the City of Santa Ana consists of two parents and <br />2.72 children, there would be 517 children living on site as a result of the proposed <br />project. Based on available census data for the City of Santa Ana, approximately <br />298 of the children on site would be school-aged children. Of these children <br />approximately 165 would attend elementary school, 45 would attend middle school, <br />and 88 would attend high school (U.S. Census Bureau 2000:Matrix P14). If families <br />with children become residents at the proposed project site, the proposed project <br />would increase the number of students attending schools. The project applicant <br />would be required to pay development school impact fees to offset the increase in <br />school population that would result from the proposed project. Impacts would be less <br />than significant after payment of school impact fees. <br />Parks <br />Less Than Significant Impact. The demand for parks is generally associated with <br />the increase of housing or population in an area. Although it is unlikely that the <br />population on site would increase, it is possible that the increase in permanent <br />housing provided by the proposed project may increase the population that use <br />parks, which would increase demand on existing parks. Based on census data, the <br />proposed project could increase the population by 897 persons (U.S. Census Bureau <br />2000:Matrices P17, P26, P27, P33, P34, P35). The project applicant would be <br />required to pay park impact fees to offset the demand for parks caused by the <br />increase in population on site. The impacts would be less than significant after <br />payment of park impact fees. <br />Other Public Facilities <br />No Impact. The project would not require any other new or altered service facilities. <br />No impacts would occur. <br />XIV. Recreation <br />A. Less Than Significant Impact. An increase in the use of parks is generally <br />associated with the increase of housing or population in an area. Although it is <br />unlikely that the population on site would increase, it is possible that the increase in <br />permanent housing provided by the proposed project may increase the population <br />that use parks, which would increase demand on existing parks. Based on census <br />data, the proposed project could increase the population by 897 persons (U.S. <br />Census Bureau 2000:Matrices P17, P26, P27, P33, P34, P35). The increase in <br />population caused by the proposed project would accelerate the deterioration of <br />existing recreational facilities. On site recreation facilities in the form of lawns, pool <br />renovations, picnic areas, etc. would provide onsite recreation for residents so that <br />residents would not need to use existing City recreational facilities. Although on site <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-28 <br />J&5 0296.0] <br />75D-85 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.