My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - MEDICAL MARIJUANA - PROHIBIT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
10/01/2007
>
75A - PH - MEDICAL MARIJUANA - PROHIBIT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:37:35 PM
Creation date
9/26/2007 2:00:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
10/1/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE: <br />• Street level dealers trying to sell to those going to the dispensary at a lower price <br />• People are smoking marijuana i.n public around the facility <br />• People coming to the community from out of town and out of state to obtain <br />Marijuana (Nevada State, San aoaquin County, etc) <br />• Marijuana DUI by people who have obtained from dispensary <br />• At least one burglary attempt into building <br />(Source Rocklin P.D. report} <br />On January 13, 2006 the proprietor of th.e Roseville's MMJ Dispensary was indicated by <br />a Federal. Grand Jury on 19 counts of marijuana trafficking and money laundering. The <br />indictment alleges that in an eight month period the defendant made approximately <br />$2,750,849A0 from the sale of MMJ and of that figure $356,130.00 was traced to money <br />laundering activities. The U.S. Attorney handling the case stated, "This case is a perfect <br />example of a person using medical marijuana as a smokescreen to hide his true agenda, <br />which is to line .his pockets with illegal drug money." <br />(Source Press release California State Attorney Generals Office) <br />SACRAMENTO <br />Sacramento has four dispensaries. Relatively few crimes other than at Ieast two burglary <br />attempts. Most of the complaints came to the council via citizens regarding quality of life <br />issues i.e. loitering, traffic and use of marijuana in or near the dispensaries. <br />July 7, 2005. The director of Aitemati.ve Specialties dispensary, charged by feds <br />following raid by Sacramento County Sheriff that uncovered two indoor gardens with an <br />alleged 800 plants. Sheriffs say the subject had a criminal record for embezzlement and. <br />failed to file for a business license. He was charged with the manufacture of. marijuana <br />and illegal possession of weapons. <br />{Source http•//www canorml or~lnews/fedmmicases.html) <br />SAID DIEGO <br />Dec i2, 2005 -Interagency task force raids 13 of 19 San Diego dispensaries. Task force <br />led by DEA with state police. Raids conducted under state, not federal search warrant. No <br />arrests, investigation ongoing. <br />(Source httt~•//www canorml ors/news/fedmmicases.html) <br />July 7, 2006: Medical marijuana dispensaries charged with drug trafficking <br />ALLISON HOFFMAN Associated Press <br />Federal prosecutors accused six people Thursday of illegally trafficking pot under the <br />cover of California's medical marijuana laws - in some cases processed into baked goods, <br />"Reefer's" peanut butter cups and "Sptii" peanut butter. Federal and state search warrants <br />were executed at more than 11 locations throughout San Diego in a morning raid, and at <br />least five people were arrested, authorities said. Federal charges were expected to be filed <br />Friday, according to U.S. Attorney Carol Lam. <br />19 <br />75A-28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.