My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - MEDICAL MARIJUANA - PROHIBIT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
10/01/2007
>
75A - PH - MEDICAL MARIJUANA - PROHIBIT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:37:35 PM
Creation date
9/26/2007 2:00:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
10/1/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ZOA No. 2007-04 and OA No. 2007-02 <br />September 24, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br />Analysis of the Issues <br />Under federal law, marijuana is considered a Schedule I drug which <br />denotes "a high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, <br />and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised <br />treatment." But California has two statutes dealing with medical <br />marijuana. The Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (the "Compassionate Use <br />Act") was enacted through a popular initiative, Proposition 215. The <br />Medical Marijuana Program Act of 2004 was enacted by the State <br />Legislature in the belief that Proposition 215 was being ignored by <br />California cities and counties. Both of the Acts provide a defense to <br />criminal prosecution for possession, cultivation, and transportation of <br />marijuana in certain circumstances. <br />In June 2005, the United States Supreme Court, relying on the Commerce <br />Clause and Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, held that <br />this California state law does not provide a defense to individuals <br />prosecuted in federal court for cultivation, transportation, or <br />possession of marijuana. After the June 2005 Supreme Court decision, <br />many cities, including Santa Ana, enacted moratoriums to study the issue <br />of medical marijuana dispensaries. Currently, many cities are facing <br />the same predicament that Santa Ana is facing with their moratoriums <br />about to expire. <br />In Orange County, the cities of Tustin, Anaheim, Fullerton and Costa <br />Mesa have all banned medical marijuana dispensaries from their cities. <br />Anaheim recently enacted their ban and also decreed that any <br />dispensaries already in existence would have to close. The City of <br />Huntington Beach initially allowed medical marijuana dispensaries in <br />general and limited industrial zones but is considering deleting this <br />permission for medical marijuana dispensaries in its zoning code. On <br />July 17, 2007, the Board of Supervisors for the County voted to approve <br />a fee for the issuance of identification cards for patients and primary <br />caregivers, which each county is mandated to issue under the state <br />Medical Marijuana Program Act. The County has not addressed them from a <br />land use perspective in the unincorporated areas. <br />Elsewhere, Pasadena, Fresno, Susanville, and Concord, among others, have <br />also banned medical marijuana dispensaries. All of the aforementioned <br />cities were sued by a non-profit group called the American Medical <br />Marijuana Association (ANNA) that promotes the use of medical marijuana. <br />Susanville and Concord prevailed at the demurrer stage and the lawsuit <br />75A-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.