My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11A - ORD MED MARIJUANA DISP
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
11/05/2007
>
11A - ORD MED MARIJUANA DISP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:36:33 PM
Creation date
10/30/2007 6:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
11A
Date
11/5/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grove, Hayward, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Cruz, <br />Santa Rosa, Visalia, West Hollywood, and Whittier are among <br />some of the cities which allow medical marijuana dispensaries in <br />specified zones. This statistic may be somewhat misleading, <br />however. For example, while Whittier permits dispensaries in its <br />industrial zone, it has ordered the only existing dispensary in the <br />city to close within one year. <br />H. Currently, Long Beach, Corona, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, <br />Santa Clarita, and Simi Valley, among others, still have <br />moratoriums in place. Several other cities have opted not to <br />address the issue at the Council level, on the theory that (a) any <br />land use not expressly permitted by the zoning code is banned, <br />and/or (b) no land use can be legally established that violates <br />federal law. These cities include Orange, San Juan Capistrano, <br />Burbank, and Glendale. <br />Numerous law enforcement agencies have expressed concerns <br />regarding medical marijuana dispensaries and cooperatives in their <br />areas. The California Police Chief's Association (CPCA) recently <br />compiled a report containing data from several jurisdictions which <br />illustrates some of law enforcement's complaints about these <br />facilities: the facilities violate federal law, street dealers often sell at <br />lower prices to entice patients away from dispensaries, non- <br />residents travel to the city to purchase marijuana, neighboring <br />businesses have experienced a loss of customers, there appears to <br />be an increase in unreported crime to avoid negative publicity, <br />there have been robberies outside of and at the dispensaries, there <br />have been home invasion robberies of individuals who utilize or are <br />employed by the dispensaries, and patients selling to non-patients. <br />In addition, the media have investigated and reported about several <br />physicians suspected of providing prescriptions of medical <br />marijuana when they have not evaluated the patient's medical <br />condition or the patient has no serious medical condition that would <br />warrant a prescription. <br />J. The secondary effects outlined in the CPCA report, the EI Cerrito <br />Police Department memorandum and the Anaheim declarations are <br />likely to occur in Santa Ana if medical marijuana dispensaries are <br />allowed to legally operate. Unlike the cities and counties which <br />have opted to not adopt ordinances addressing this issue, Santa <br />Ana has a broad zoning use classification of "retail and service" <br />uses (Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-144) which would <br />appear to allow medical marijuana dispensaries. Accordingly, once <br />the moratorium expires and without a ban, medical marijuana <br />dispensaries would be allowed to operate in all specific <br />Ordinance No. NS-XXX <br />11 A-3 Page 3 of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.