My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH 3321 SOUTH FAIRVIEW ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
11/05/2007
>
75A - PH 3321 SOUTH FAIRVIEW ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:36:56 PM
Creation date
10/31/2007 11:31:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
11/5/2007
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Other Public Facilities <br />No Impact. The project would not require any other new or altered service facilities. No <br />impacts would occur. <br />XIV. Recreation <br />A. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. An increase in the use of parks is <br />generally associated with the increase of housing or population in an area. The increase in <br />housing provided by the proposed project would increase the population that uses parks, <br />which may increase demand on existing parks. The increase in population caused by the <br />proposed project would accelerate the deterioration of existing recreational facilities. <br />Although onsite recreation facilities would reduce impacts to existing City recreational <br />facilities, the project applicant would be subject to an acquisition and development fee paid to <br />the City Parks and Recreation Department. The impacts would be less than significant after <br />payment of park impact fees or construction of an off tract park (see Mitigation Measure PS- <br />2). <br />B. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would replace the existing tilt-up <br />concrete warehouse with 38 single-family residential units. Associated land use <br />improvements with those units include landscaping and open recreational areas. It is not <br />anticipated that the installation of the onsite landscaping and recreational areas would result <br />in an adverse physical effect on the environment. Impacts associated with these <br />improvements have been addressed in the respective sections of this Initial Study. Impacts <br />would be less than significant. <br />XV. Transportation/Traffic <br />A. Less Than Significant Impact. The project would result in a change in traffic on the local <br />roadway network in the vicinity of the project site. The Trip Generation Manual defines the <br />existing warehouse as a "Light Industrial" use. Light industrial uses usually employ fewer <br />than 500 persons, with an emphasis on activities other than manufacturing, and typically <br />have minimal office space (Institute of Transportation Engineers 2003:89). The existing <br />warehouse currently generates 370 daily trips to the site, including 49 AM peak hour and 52 <br />PM peak hour trips. The proposed project would generate 364 daily trips to the site, <br />including 29 AM peak hour and 39 PM peak hour trips. This would result in a net decrease of <br />6 daily trips, 20 AM peak hour, and 13 PM peak hour trips to the site. Therefore, <br />implementation of the proposed project would not significantly impact local intersections or <br />roadway segments. <br />B. No Impact. The Orange County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) states that "a traffic <br />impact analysis (TIA) will be required for CMP purpose for all proposed developments <br />generating 2,400 or more daily trips" and that "for developments which will directly access a <br />CMP Highway System link, the threshold for requiring a TIA should be reduced to 1,600 or <br />more trips per day" (OCTA 2005:61). The proposed project would access Alton Avenue, <br />which is not a CMP facility. Furthermore, the proposed project would not produce more than <br />2,400 daily trips. Therefore, no threshold would be violated and no impact would occur. <br />Alton Court August 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3-38 <br />J&S 00635.07 <br />75A-104 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.